Thanks for the info Johannes. Given the absence of timeline and therefore no historical data, it is unlikely that a tez history UI will be supported against 2.2. That said, there is probably going to be future work to build a UI into the application master itself for tracking a running DAG which likely should not be timeline dependent.
— HItesh On Dec 9, 2014, at 8:29 PM, Johannes Zillmann <[email protected]> wrote: > We have a wide range of customers… so basically all of them ;) > Anyhow would be good to have at least clear announcements like for 0.5 there > is 2.2 minimum, for 0.6 there is… etc.. > If the Hadoop UI integration could be delivered with 2.2 that would be > awesome! > > best > Johannes > >> On 08 Dec 2014, at 19:02, Hitesh Shah <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the info, Douglas. We will not be dropping support for 2.4 for >> sure at the moment. >> >> Anyone else have any comments in this regard? >> >> @Bikas/@Sid - what do we do about publishing jars for a release? We would >> need to publish 2 or 3 sets? >> >> thanks >> — Hitesh >> >> On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:51 PM, Moore, Douglas >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> 2.4.x and beyond for the customers we have >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Hitesh Shah <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello folks >>>> >>>> Could folks who are following these mailing lists do a raise of hands on >>>> which versions of Hadoop you are trying to run Tez on? >>>> >>>> 1) 2.2.x >>>> 2) 2.3.x >>>> 3) 2.4.x >>>> 4) 2.5.x >>>> 5) 2.6.x >>>> >>>> Given that we are building out the UI and for the large part, the History >>>> UI ( i.e. the one which will display DAG details after an app has >>>> disappeared ) will be dependent on YARN Timeline, the UI will not be >>>> supported for Hadoop versions 2.2.x and 2.3.x given that they do not >>>> support Timeline. >>>> Likewise, ACLs support in Timeline was introduced in Hadoop 2.6.x - this >>>> means ACLs will not be enforceable on Hadoop 2.4.x and 2.5.x >>>> >>>> Also, as part of TEZ-1696, I also propose changing the default version to >>>> 2.6.0 given that secure Timeline is only available as of 2.6.0. >>>> >>>> Thoughts/concerns? >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> — Hitesh >>>> >> >
