This debate has gone back and forth, and generally the result has been that we'd prefer to have simple internal implementations over pulling in complex external packages.
2010/12/15 Bjørn Borud <[email protected]> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:07 PM, David Jeske <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I may undertake this, but for C# not java (as that's where I need it). I > > asked about Java because I'm looking for the 'thrifty' way to do this > > pattern, since it should probably be fairly similar across > language-stubs. > > Aside from that, I figure the C# stub patterns should be pretty similar > to > > the Java stub patterns. > > > > > > David, > > on a slightly tangential note: do you know if there is something similar to > Netty in C# land? > > (the reason I ask is because I can't help but think that perhaps Thrift > could benefit from using a more complete IO library to implement the low > level IO than to have its own implementation. this would make things like > SSL (which required a patch) have worked with just a couple of lines of > extra code. if something similar exists for other languages one might be > more inclined to consider it) > > -Bjørn >
