...and its not super inefficient. Auto-boxing in the JVM is fairly efficient.
K On 29 July 2011 07:55, Chiku <[email protected]> wrote: > Java does not support List<int>! > It only supports list of objects. Hence, Integer. > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Gautam Thaker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I have a thrift file that has: > > > > typedef list<byte> OctetSeq > > typedef list<i32> IntegerSeq > > > > service ATL { > > i16 octet_thruput(1:OctetSeq payload), > > i16 integer_thruput(1:IntegerSeq payload) > > } > > > > The code produced by "-gen java" uses the following: > > > > > > OctetSeq -> List<Byte> > > IntegerSeq -> List<Integer> > > > > This produces super inefficient code in Java. Is it possible for the > > mapping produced to use List<byte> and List<int> ? I suspect their > > marshalling and transport and unmarshalling would be far more efficient. > > > > As comparison in CPP the mapping produced is: > > > > typedef std::vector<int8_t> OctetSeq; > > typedef std::vector<int32_t> IntegerSeq; > > > > respectively, and CPP is pretty effecient. > > > > Gautam > > > -- - Regards, Dr Kris West www.urfilez.com Tel (US): +1 217 883 4553 Tel (UK): +44 7715 104291 / +44 7715 104292
