Hi,

I'm sorry, I just mean the CLIENT side, not server: which client, write in 
various script languages, performed the best/fastest, except C/C++, given just 
one thrift server, e.g TNonblockingServer?




Xie Ling
IZP Technology

From: Alex Parenteau
Date: 2012-03-21 23:51
To: user
Subject: RE: which performed the best/fastest, except C/C++?
Hi,

That's a bit vague, given how many combinations are possible to write a thrift 
server, even given the same language.

In my experience the fastest Thrift server I've seen was with python+greenlets.

I too be interested to see a regular benchmark about some of the popular thrift 
servers.

alex

-----Original Message-----
From: xieling [mailto:xiel...@izptec.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:57 AM
To: user
Subject: which performed the best/fastest, except C/C++?

Hi everyone,

I write a python script(as thrift client) to test my thrift server, and found 
that a client in C++ completed about 20K RPC calls in 1s, while another client 
in python just completed 6K!

Is there any performance test among the script-languages as thrift clients?
Can anyone tell me which performed the best/fastest, except C/C++?

Thank you very much!




Xie Ling
IZP Technology

Reply via email to