I think PMD or FindBugs might report that. It might be worth adding those
into the build servers task.

I'll work on a patch and will submit shortly.

John


On 3 March 2016 at 00:31, Ken Krugler <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up - I'd run into the same issue when working in
> Tika 2.0, and had made a note to discuss on the list.
>
> SLF4J would be my preferred option as well.
>
> Wondering if we could configure the build to check for use of other
> logging frameworks besides SLF4J?
>
> -- Ken
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* John Patrick
>
> *Sent:* March 2, 2016 3:13:15pm PST
>
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* Logging
>
> Tika appears to use two logging frameworks, Commons Logging and SLF4J.
>
> Is that correct?
>
> Commons Logging is used by;
> tika-app
> tika-parsers
> tika-server
>
> SLF4J is used by;
> tika-batch
> tika-core
> tika-parsers
> tika-translate
>
> If I do a patch which way should I refactor? My personal preference is to
> use SLF4J.
>
> John
>
>
>
> --------------------------
> Ken Krugler
> +1 530-210-6378
> http://www.scaleunlimited.com
> custom big data solutions & training
> Hadoop, Cascading, Cassandra & Solr
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to