tika team bumping this thread as i beleive tika is using a non asl/asf compatible library.
thanks joe On Dec 6, 2017 12:27 AM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> wrote: > Tika Team, > > I'm finally coming back to this thread and getting Apache NiFi all > caught up with the latest Tika-Core and Tika-Parsers version. > > I am back to looking at the GeoAPIs 3.0.0 stuff which as you mentioned > the license is ok. It does, however, have a transitive dependency on > 'JSR 275 0.9.3' library. The license for this was much harder to find > but this appears to be it [1] and it appears decided un-ASF friendly > to me. Can you please clarify why this library is ok to use? I'm just > trying to get our L&N done for NiFi so want to understand how this is > ok. I was not able to find anything in the Legal discuss/JIRA for > this. > > Here is the GeoAPIs team talking about this dependency and what they > will do with it [2, 3]. > > [1] https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/jsr-275/blob/0.9.3/LICENSE.txt > [2] https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEO-190 > [3] https://github.com/opengeospatial/geoapi/issues/8 > > Thanks > Joe > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thanks Joe. The legal-discuss/committee for the ASF is discussing > getting a 6 > > month time period on this b/c there are transitive dependencies all over > for > > this. We will be appreciative of a time frame since I think replacing it > with > > another JSON library will likely be non trivial and involve some PRs. > > > > RE: [2] and [3] it’s the same dependencies that Apache SIS uses and I > think > > we are good there – in fact they are pulled in by SIS. > > > > Thanks, > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > On 11/15/16, 8:06 PM, "Joe Witt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Tika Team, > > > > The ASF has recently changed their mind regarding the json.org [0] > dependency this individual is referring to [1]. I believe that JIRA needs > to be reopened. It has blocked Apache NiFi from being able to update to > using the newest tika-parsers. > > > > In reviewing the list of other new dependencies I also ran across > geoapis which was pulled in during [2]. It's license looks questionable to > me given the claim of need to give notice to any changed OGC files. It > looks BSD-ish but not quite sure [3]. I don't see this called out in your > LICENSE or NOTICE and I could not find a legal thread. Are you sure this > is ok to use? > > > > [0] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-x > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1804 > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-443 > > [3] https://github.com/opengeospatial/geoapi/blob/3.0.0/LICENSE.txt > > > > Thanks > > Joe > > > > > > >
