Is there anything that leaps out that needs attention?

On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 7:12 AM Markus Jelsma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ah, there are some differences this time, except for MboxParser, of course :)
>
> Very nice to see this happening, it wasn't present/noticed in the other set
> tiff:ImageWidth,727519
> tiff:ImageLength,727512
>
> There are this time also quite a few with whitespaces in the keys:
> Dimension HorizontalPixelSize,166272
> Dimension VerticalPixelSize,166272
>
> Attempts to do some Javascript:
> <script>,1
> var gcse = document.createElement(,1
> var s = document.getElementsByTagName(,1
>
> Something that appears to be a 'tag cloud' of a Dutch blog about travelling 
> to Thailand:
> "thailand,thailand forum,bangkok,chiang mai,vakantie,accommodatie,hotel,surat 
> thani,tuktuk,eiland,krabi,phuket,sukothai,phi phi,khao 
> sok,guesthouse,national 
> park,isaan,monnik,samui,panghan,bergvolk,eiland,trein,vliegtuig,ayutthaya,visum,thai,sawasdee,tempelflower",1
>
> More tag clouds:
> "homoeopathy, homopati, homeopathy, homeopati, hormon, alopaty, allopaty, 
> alopati, biochemic, biokemik, biokimia",1
> "homopati, homopathy, homeopati, homoeopati, biochemic, biokimia",1
>
> Chinese, Cyrillic and Arabic mixed with Latin. Especially Arabic is weird 
> when displayed correctly with the ,1 on its left:
> custom:Шифр,1
> custom:тавсўф,1
> custom:آموزش ایندیزاین,1
> custom:关键字,1
>
> Escaping gone mad:
> "\""content-type\""",5
>
> There are also e-mail addresses that i am not going to put down here. And i 
> must say, after looking through it, MboxParser did still surprise me.
>
> Thanks,
> Markus
>
> Op do 6 okt. 2022 om 17:27 schreef Tim Allison <[email protected]>:
>>
>> I reprocessed a million files and wrote proper UTF-8 csv files.  This
>> did away with any risk of me botching something via copy/paste from
>> stdout.
>>
>> https://corpora.tika.apache.org/base/share/metadata-keys-1m-20221006.tgz
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 4:03 PM Markus Jelsma <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Tim,
>> >
>> > I would expect that many strange keys are actually present in the source 
>> > data, and are not due to an error somewhere in Tika or its dependencies. 
>> > Although mboxparser could have an issue somewhere.
>> >
>> > But it might be an idea to map some bad keys to their proper counterpart, 
>> > such as keywords, content-type and friends.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Markus
>> >
>> > Op ma 3 okt. 2022 om 17:10 schreef Tim Allison <[email protected]>:
>> >>
>> >> Thank you, Markus, for looking through these sheets.  There's a chance
>> >> I botched the encodings in transferring data from one location to
>> >> another.  Let me take another look, and yes, we've got to make some
>> >> improvements to the mbox parser.
>> >>
>> >> More digging for me to do on the data and your findings!
>> >>
>> >> Thank you!
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 10:56 AM Markus Jelsma
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > These aggregations of large real world sets are always interesting to 
>> >> > look through. Especially because they are bound to have a lot of 
>> >> > garbage and peculiarities. There are probably some badly chosen key 
>> >> > names, and very likely many programming errors.
>> >> >
>> >> > Some interesting examples:
>> >> >
>> >> > what is this:
>> >> > Выберите_расширение_для_паковки
>> >> >
>> >> > the usual mixing of double-colon variants, there are also many escaped 
>> >> > quotes:
>> >> > ”keywords” and \"keywords\"
>> >> >
>> >> > these two are identical, but given a large enough set, they might not 
>> >> > be:
>> >> > height 512205
>> >> > width 512205
>> >> >
>> >> > mboxparser spews out a lot of garbage, incredible:
>> >> > MboxParser- $b!zf|!!;~![#1#07n#2#2f|!j6b!k#1#4;~h>!a#1#7;~h>!r$=$n8e 3
>> >> > MboxParser- $b"($3$n%a!<%k$o!"4x@>#i#t6&f1bn$x$4;22cd 3
>> >> > MboxParser- $b"(?=$79~$_!&%"%/%;%9ey!">\ 3
>> >> >
>> >> > really, it does:
>> >> > MboxParser-_blank">http 3
>> >> > MboxParser-a-aa-azzzzzzz-azzzzazzzzz-azzzzzzzazzzzzzzzzazzzzzazzzzzzzzzaz
>> >> >  3
>> >> > MboxParser-a-aa-azzzzzzz-azzzzzzzz-azzzzazzzzzazzzzzzazzzzzzz 3
>> >> >
>> >> > non-Latin scripts are expected, this is simplified Chinese:
>> >> > if:头像和分页采用圆形样式 (translation: Avatars and pagination in a circular style 
>> >> > (?))
>> >> >
>> >> > perhaps shortest possible key name:
>> >> > T 4
>> >> >
>> >> > mboxparser, again, this time with XML tags:
>> >> > MboxParser-ype>state</span></font></st1:placetype></st1 4
>> >> > MboxParser-ype>university</span></font></st1:placetype></st1:place></st1
>> >> >  4
>> >> >
>> >> > the set seems to contain stuff from adult sites:
>> >> > xhamster-site-verification
>> >> >
>> >> > for some reason, the Dutch government always pops up in large sets:
>> >> > custom:OVERHEID.Informatietype/DC.type  13
>> >> > custom:OVERHEID.Organisatietype/OVERHEID.organisationType       13
>> >> >
>> >> > there are 18 different ways to spell/use Content-Type, of which four 
>> >> > are, of course, with mboxparser:
>> >> > Content-Type    6612729
>> >> > content_type    14
>> >> > \"Content-Type\"        9
>> >> > \"content-type\"        5
>> >> >
>> >> > the inevitable encoding error:
>> >> > pdf:docinfo:custom:-ý§ Q 10
>> >> > pagerankâ„¢ 50
>> >> >
>> >> > what.is.this:
>> >> > Laisv371DiskusijuIrK363rybosForumas 4
>> >> >
>> >> > hey, another contenter for the shortest key name:
>> >> > M 4
>> >> >
>> >> > there are 67 unique dcterms key names, but their counts are not very 
>> >> > high:
>> >> > DCTERMS.title   44
>> >> > dcterms.title   26
>> >> > dcterms:title   13
>> >> > dcterms.Title   3
>> >> >
>> >> > there is also a Content-Type in Russian:
>> >> > Тип-содержимое 3
>> >> >
>> >> > someone wants to remove your dust:
>> >> > Dust_Removal_Data 339
>> >> >
>> >> > there are 908 unique unknown tags, no idea what that is:
>> >> > Exif_IFD0:Unknown_tag_(0x8482)  36
>> >> > Unknown_tag_(0x00bf)    36
>> >> > Exif_SubIFD:Unknown_tag_(0x9009)        35
>> >> > Unknown_tag_(0x00a0)    35
>> >> > Unknown_tag_(0x050e)    35
>> >> >
>> >> > ah, the winner of the shortest key name (line 2235):
>> >> > 71
>> >> >
>> >> > longest key, guess who:
>> >> > MboxParser-http://www.facebook.com/donnakuhnarthttps://www.flickr.com/photos/donnakuhnhttp://picassogirl.tumblr.comhttps://twitter.com/digitalaardvarkhttps://plus.google.com/+digitalaardvarkshttps://www.linkedin.com/in/donnakuhnhttp://www.saatchionline.com/donnakuhnhttp://pinterest.com/sarcasthttps
>> >> >         3
>> >> >
>> >> > Besides Latin, Japanese and Chinese, Cyrillic is also present. But the 
>> >> > six most frequently used Arabic symbols are not present. I wonder why. 
>> >> > But there is an RTL-script present, Hebrew. It is always strange to 
>> >> > meet terms/wors of RTL-scripts in an otherwise general LTR-world.
>> >> >
>> >> > I was a bit disappointed not to find any obscene terms. The set seemed 
>> >> > to be large enough for at least some general curse words.
>> >> >
>> >> > MboxParser is the real winner with 1763 unique keys, this is really 
>> >> > absurd!
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks, this was fun!
>> >> > Markus
>> >> >
>> >> > Op ma 3 okt. 2022 om 15:26 schreef Tim Allison <[email protected]>:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> All,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   I recently extracted metadata keys from 1 million files in our
>> >> >> regression corpus and did a group by.  This allows insight into common
>> >> >> metadata keys.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   I've included two views, one looks at overall counts, and the other
>> >> >> breaks down metadata keys by mime type.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   Please let us know if you find anything interesting or have any 
>> >> >> questions.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://corpora.tika.apache.org/base/share/metadata-keys-overall-1m.txt.gz
>> >> >> https://corpora.tika.apache.org/base/share/metadata-keys-by-mime-1m.txt.gz
>> >> >>
>> >> >>    Best,
>> >> >>
>> >> >>             Tim

Reply via email to