Don’t have a quick answer to that, I’m afraid. But I’ll ask a colleague who is more familiar with the subject.
Tim Allison <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi. 12. Apr. 2023 um 21:23: > Thank you, are there other jakarta-adjacent or similar upgrades we > should make in a 3.x branch? > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:56 PM John Ulric <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I don't have a complete overview, of course, but many projects seem to > make that package change along with a major version. And yes, when > switching to Jakarta packages, it would probably be okay to also switch to > mandatory Java 11. (2.x runs on Java 11 optionally, AFAIK?) –John > > > > Tim Allison <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi. 12. Apr. 2023 um 20:47: > >> > >> Thank you, John. I'm wondering if we should hold off on this until > >> Tika 3.x? Maybe we start a 3.x branch and cut over to Java 11 while > >> we're at it? > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:17 AM John Ulric <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > This relates to the change from javax.* package names to jakarta.* > package names. No matter which way you do it, it will probably break things > for those still/already “on the other side” of that change. I guess the > only nice way is to proceed with two artifacts for a certain time, one with > the old dependency chain and one with the new one. > >> > > >> > Reference: > >> > https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/issues/1174 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Tim Allison <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi. 12. Apr. 2023 um > 12:31: > >> >> > >> >> Can you recommend a blog post or SO on the benefits/risks of this? > >> >> I'm happy to make the change if it doesn't break stuff for others. > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 4:50 AM Maxim Solodovnik < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > Hello, > >> >> > > >> >> > tika-parsers-standard-package:2.7.0 > >> >> > depends on > >> >> > tika-parser-crypto-module:2.7.0 > >> >> > depends on > >> >> > bcmail-jdk18on:1.72 > >> >> > > >> >> > To be jackarta-friendly bcmail-jdk18on:1.72 should be replaced with > >> >> > bcjmail-jdk18on:1.72 > >> >> > > >> >> > Are there any plans to release jackarta-friendly > tika-parsers-standard-package ? > >> >> > > >> >> > Or maybe it is safe to replace bcmail-jdk18on:1.72 with > >> >> > bcjmail-jdk18on:1.72 in our pom? :) > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Best regards, > >> >> > Maxim >
