Slightly late to the party, but +1 on option 4 as well. Though I would prefer a slightly less formal font, the one in option 6 is too spaced out and I'm not fond of it overall...
But that's really a nit and this is infinitely better than no logo at all.... Thanks Ken! -Carol P. --------------------------------------------------------------- Email: carol.pearson...@gmail.com Twitter: @CarolP222 --------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> wrote: > Neither. Keep the font the same for Apache and Trafodion. Bold them both. > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan < > sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote: > >> Perhaps we should try and see how lowercase with both placements look. >> The dragon on top looks better to many. We can take votes again J >> >> >> >> *From:* Wei-Shiun Tsai [mailto:wei-shiun.t...@esgyn.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:13 PM >> >> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >> >> >> >> +1 for Dave’s and Hans’ suggestion. Like the dragon to sit on the right, >> not on top of Trafodion. But the font in #4 looks more professional >> (perhaps also in lower case). >> >> >> >> Weishiun >> >> >> >> *From:* Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:04 PM >> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I like the font for option 4 (perhaps lower cased as Hans mentioned), but >> with the placement of option 6. >> >> >> >> That said, either one is fine. >> >> >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> *From:* Eric Owhadi [mailto:eric.owh...@esgyn.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 3:02 PM >> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >> >> >> >> +1 option 4 >> >> >> >> *From:* Anuradha Hegde [mailto:anuradha.he...@esgyn.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 4:57 PM >> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >> >> >> >> +1 option 4 >> >> >> >> *From:* Ken Holt [mailto:knhknhknh...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:51 PM >> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal >> >> >> >> Seems like the dragon logo itself is a winner - most everyone liked that. >> >> But the combined logo and name was definitely not popular. >> >> >> >> Here are a couple of new suggestions for the combined logo and name. >> >> >> >> Option 4 >> >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4T3o3YVBDakNtQkU/view?usp=sharing >> >> >> >> Option 6 >> >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y082OHhNNXBwazA/view?usp=sharing >> >> >> >> Don't ask for options 1-3, & 5 - they didn't make it passed my limited >> field testing! >> >> Comments on 4 & 6? >> >> >> >> Cheers, Ken >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Sandhya Sundaresan < >> sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote: >> >> I’d say there is enough “curliness” going on with the dragon. So we >> could try with a simple bold font . Perhaps with an outline of a different >> color like Hadoop’s/Mahouts is and tie it in with the dragon’s colors as >> well. >> >> >> >> *From:* Hans Zeller [mailto:hans.zel...@esgyn.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 3:46 PM >> >> >> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal >> >> >> >> +1 for the dragon as well. We used to have an informal logo with another >> somewhat cursive font, it shows in one of the carousel pictures on the >> trafodion.apache.org site. That might be better (although still not my >> favorite). >> >> >> Hans >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Ken Holt <knhknhknh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> By the way, the size of the example logo is arbitrary. The original is a >> vector graphics file that will scale up or down with no loss of quality, >> which I will make available when the debate has settled on something. >> >> >> >> I'll make a stab at changing the font and size relative to the dragon and >> post another version of that. >> >> >> >> Agree that separating the dragon from the name/font makes sense. >> >> Cheers, Ken >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> >> +1 on dragon. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Carol Pearson < >> carol.pearson...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 on the Dragon!!! Looks great! >> >> >> >> On the writing, cursive is hard to read, so I'm up for replacing it >> separately. Maybe we vote on each separately (as Sandhya and Amanda did)? >> >> >> >> >> >> Voting separately is a good idea. Having engineers vote on 'designs' is >> always a tough one. Sounds like folks like the dragon but not the >> cursive... so suggest splitting out what we vote on so at least the dragon >> carries. >> >> >> >> St.Ack >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Carol P. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Email: carol.pearson...@gmail.com >> >> Twitter: @CarolP222 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Sandhya Sundaresan < >> sandhya.sundare...@esgyn.com> wrote: >> >> +1 for Dragon. >> >> The Trafodion cursive writing and color -1. IMHO we need to rework the >> writing for sure and try various colors. It’s looking cluttered and >> complicated with the cursive. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Amanda Moran [mailto:amanda.mo...@esgyn.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 10:13 AM >> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >> *Subject:* Re: Logo Proposal >> >> >> >> +10 for dragon! Very cute! >> >> >> >> Not a huge fan of the cursive writing myself... but if everyone else >> likes... I give it a +0 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Christophe LeRouzo <c...@esgyn.com> >> wrote: >> >> Thanks Ken, the standalone dragon looks really good. It complements >> really well the yellow elephant! >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -clr >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Dave Birdsall [mailto:dave.birds...@esgyn.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:53 AM >> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >> *Subject:* RE: Logo Proposal >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I like both. I do agree that the font for “Trafodion” makes a’s and o’s >> too much alike. Would be nice to switch to another font that doesn’t have >> that issue. >> >> >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> *From:* Ken Holt [mailto:knhknhknh...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 9, 2016 9:48 AM >> *To:* user@trafodion.incubator.apache.org >> *Subject:* Logo Proposal >> >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> Apache Trafodion needs a logo. >> >> >> >> I believe there was some discussion about a logo for Trafodion quite some >> time ago, but we never really resolved it. In the very early days of >> Trafodion, before becoming an Apache project (incubating) I devised a logo >> that leveraged the Welsh connection of the project name, and that was a >> simple cute dragon. >> >> >> >> I now have a much improved version of that original logo and propose that >> we use this as the official Trafodion logo going forward. >> >> >> >> Dragon standalone - >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4QmttYnBzZDdFSTQ/view?usp=sharing >> >> Trafodion name & dragon - >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9c1EkzsNnw4Y3RRdVQwb0owSFU/view?usp=sharing >> >> >> >> I’m not thrilled with the font choice for “Trafodion” – the o’s and a’s >> look too similar. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? Should we vote on this? >> >> >> >> Cheers, Ken >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Amanda Moran >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Gunnar > *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.* >
