Hi,
I thought I'd better get the Turbine source for V2.3.1 to see what is
going on fully for my problem. No mirrors have it or any version for
that matter, marc as stopped archiving the Turbine lists. Seems since
going to a full project things have gone backwards. The apache list
archives link is broken. What a mess!
David
David Wynter wrote:
Hi,
I do not follow you? Nowhere do I specify anything to do with changing
the Group from the std default class. This is the standard framework
behaving like this. The only changes I have made are to do with
replacing TurbineUser with my own extended class. How many people have
attempted to extend from TurbineUser based on those instructions?
I now understand a little more. I cannot work out how this ever worked
to tell you the truth. This reflection work here
g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
.getConstructor(clazz)
.newInstance(params);
Is expecting to find a constructor that takes this
Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };
as a argument, and the class Turbine Security service is using,
"org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"
simply does not have that constructor. But then again neither does the
class the documentation tells me it should be using,
"org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup" have that
constructor, so how can this ever work? Am I misinterpreting the
constructor signature required?
David
Tony Oslund wrote:
Just a thought....
Instead of specifying just Group, try explicitly specifying the full
path to Group.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Wynter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August
07, 2007 4:27 AM
To: Turbine-User
Subject: [Fwd: NoSuchMethodException for GroupPeerManager.getNewGroup]
Sorry, sent the last one for an email not on the list.
Hi,
I have followed the instructions here. Using 2.3.1
http://turbine.apache.org/turbine/turbine-2.3.1/services/torque-security
-service.html
To use an extended user class. But I am getting a NoSuchMethodException
on line 656 of GroupPeerManager.java
The method looks like this
public static Group getNewGroup(Persistent p)
{
Group g = null;
try
{
Class groupWrapperClass = TurbineSecurity.getGroupClass();
Class [] clazz = new Class [] { Persistent.class };
Object [] params = new Object [] { p };
g = (Group) groupWrapperClass
.getConstructor(clazz)
.newInstance(params);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
log.error("Could not instantiate a new group from supplied
persistent: ", e);
}
return g;
}
Reading the instructions on torque-security-service.html page it says
Group Implementation
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueGroup
Peer
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroupPeer
Persistent object
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineGroup
I am only using my own TurbineUser substitute, not any of the other
security classes, so I expect from this
" Turbine uses the following configuration for accessing the Torque
schema. If you just want to use the default Peers, you don't need any
of
the following configuration, these are the defaults:" That it will use
the default stated above, so I am surprised to see it using "class
org.apache.turbine.om.security.TurbineGroup"
But the class being used is in fact sub class of BaseObject and
therefore does have an empty constructor, so I cannot work out why it
is throwing this exception anyway?
here are the relevant sections of my TurbineResources.properties
services.SecurityService.classname =
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueSecurityService
...
# This is the Peer class used to access the user peer
(org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.om.TurbineUserPeer)
services.SecurityService.user.manager =
org.apache.turbine.services.security.torque.TorqueUserManager
services.SecurityService.torque.userPeer.class =
com.stpenable.se.om.ExtendedUserPeer
services.SecurityService.user.class =
com.stpenable.se.security.ExtendedUserImpl
database.maps.builder =
com.stpenable.se.util.db.map.TurbineMapBuilderAdapter
# This is the class that implements the ACL interface.
services.SecurityService.acl.class =
org.apache.turbine.util.security.TurbineAccessControlList
Is there some configuration the article does not mention?
thanks
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
