Hi Shiva I noticed you didn't get any response. It's a while since I worked on SCA native but I'll give you my opinion. See comments in line.
Regards Simon On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Shivakumar Balasubramanyam < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > I would like to get some feedback from C++ developers from both server and > embedded platforms. > > After reviewing the code, I would like to get some feedback in reducing the > footprint of the code and also some help in adding extensions to > unsupported > transport/transport protocol. > > Some things I would like to know are, > > 1. Abstracting SDO from XML dependency. I think this would be a good idea. I guess a databinding framework is required like we have in the java implementation. > > > 2. The extensions avaialble do not have a consistent form, which is the > most > appropriate model to follow? (cpp, ws, rest?) I'm not sure but the cpp and ws have been around the longest. In what way do you see that they are inconsistent? > > > 3. Customization of the serialization libary? How is this configured? Do you mean libxml used by SDO? > > > I would also like to know what changes are done in the trunk now from the > last released version of SCA Native? I think the main changes were sorting out the build system. Looking back the tag for M3 was at revison 524039 in subversion so you could take a look at the commits since then to get a feel for what has changed. > > > Thanks, > Shiva >
