On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Rupesh M G <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Friend, > > when I compared these Tuscany 1.4 samples ---- helloworld-bpel and > helloworld-bpel-ws ---- I found only the composite files are different. > > case 1: > ---------- > <component name="BPELHelloWorldComponent"> > <implementation.bpel process="hns:HelloWorld"/> > </component> > > case 2: > ---------- > <component name="BPELHelloWorldComponent"> > <implementation.bpel process="hns:HelloWorld"/> > <service name="helloPartnerLink"> > <interface.wsdl > interface="http://tuscany.apache.org/implementation/bpel/example/helloworld.wsdl#wsdl.interface(HelloPortType)" > /> > <binding.ws /> > </service> > </component> > > > Does it mean, case 1 gives a Java (or SCA binding)? And case 2 gives a WS > binding? > > Our aim in trying SCA is to achieve local binding with BPEL, but we are not > sure if Tuscany 1.4 already implements it. > > > > Thanks & Regards, > Rupesh > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > "The information in this e-mail and any attachment is intended only for the > person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > privileged material. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly > contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original communication. IBS > makes no warranty, express or implied, nor guarantees the accuracy, adequacy > or completeness of the information contained in this email or any attachment > and is not liable for any errors, defects, omissions, viruses or for > resultant loss or damage, if any, direct or indirect." > > > > >
Hi Rupesh Yes, that's the idea. If you don't specific a binding (or manually specify binding.sca) you get the default SCA binding. The default SCA binding is a local java binding when used within a composite. Regards Simon
