On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Michael Laccetti<[email protected]> wrote: > That will be pretty tough - would be better to switch to something like > SLF4J, that way the actual end logging implementation can be a user's choice. > ________________________________________ > From: Simon Laws [[email protected]] > Sent: August-20-09 12:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Re: Logging problems with log4j > > OK, these are going through the JDK logger. I guess you would need a > handler that passes the JDK messages off to Log4J. Not sure if this is > possible as I'm not a expert in this area. Anyone else know? Otherwise > we'll have to do a few Googles to find out if there is one knocking > about. > > Regards > > Simon >
Using SLF4J does look like it would make that easier. There is something called jul-to-log4j-bridge, i know nothing about it other than whats in this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09148.html ...ant
