On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dave > > We don't have an explicit list of what's outstanding at the moment. > IMO the right thing to do is track with JIRA (in the "OASIS compliance > - Tuscany" category for Tuscany problems). Any help generating those > JIRA is very much appreciated. > > We do have a list [1] based on the OASIS JIRA where we've started > looking at what changes need to be made for the various specs but I'm > sure this is out of date now. We are only just getting back to this > now. > > As for running the otests themselves we use another page [2] to > coordinate progress amongst multiple people working on the same set of > tests. You'll see that there are only entries for the assembly ones at > the moment. I'll create a Java version of the table as the tests > become available. > > Regards > > Simon > > [1] > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/OSOA+SCA+vs+OASIS+SCA > [2] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Conformance+Testing >
Dave, I have started reviewing the Java Spec Compliance and some of the spec jiras [1] and also addressing some of these issues. Please continue to provide feedback and I can handle the JIRA and updates to [1]... [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/OSOA+SCA+vs+OASIS+SCA -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
