I've added one comment/clarification below.
Simon
Florian MOGA wrote:
Hi,
The Tuscany committers would like to clean up the current JIRA
categories and would like to find out your opinion about them.
Currently, we have 2 options:
1. Reduce the granularity to something like:
Java SCA
Java SDO
Java DAS
C++ SCA
C++ SDO
C++ DAS
OASIS Compliance - OASIS
OASIS Compliance - TUSCANY
Tools (including Hudson, Maven, SVN issues)
Website/Documentation
Community Ideas
2. Keep a separate category for the most used modules and anything that
doesn't fit in any of those can go to something like an SCA Java
Bindings, SCA Java Implementations or SCA Java Runtime folder.
As an example, this would include popular bindings such as binding.ws
and binding.jms. If people have problems with one of these bindings,
it might be helpful if they could quickly search JIRA for problems
specifically related to that binding. Would this be useful?
Simon
Which one would help you most? How do you find reporting issues to
Tuscany and what can be improved? Feel free to share your suggestions
given your experience as Tuscany users.
Thanks,
Florian
on behalf of the Tuscany committers
