The convention is to follow Java package naming conventions for the part in front of the last ".".
See http://uima.apache.org/downloads/releaseDocs/2.3.0-incubating/docs/html/tutorials_and_users_guides/tutorials_and_users_guides.html#ugr.tug.aae.defining_types and look at the first example, where it says: We use the same namespace conventions as are used for Java classes. -Marshall Schor On 11/29/2010 9:43 AM, Andrea Turbati wrote: > Hello, > > is there a standard regarding the name of Types and Features in UIMA? I've > search in the tutorial files, but I've not found a precise reference to this > aspect. I know that Types can have "." in them (as java package), but that's > all I've found > > Thanks > > Andrea Turbati >
