Looks like a problem here. Mapping a named view to the CM input works correctly; that view is delivered to the CM's process method. But there is an exception when the CM calls getEmptyCAS() because the named view does not yet exist.
One solution would be for getEmptyCAS() to create the specified view and then return it. Interestingly, just a few days ago I argued that the framework should not create views. see http://markmail.org/message/bwzamfci2uo7wx4i But this seems like a special case: a view-unaware CM has received a CAS with view V, and is expected to create new CASes with view V. Are you seeing the problem described here or another? Any comments on proposed fix? Eddie On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > are sofa mappings for CMs are supposed to work? > > Jörn
