Hi, the problem should be fixed now.
Best, Peter On 17.05.2013 12:53, Peter Klügl wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for that. I will fix it ASAP. > > The last rule has only three rule elements, but that should not throw an > exception. > > Best, > > Peter > > On 17.05.2013 12:34, [email protected] wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Let A, B, C, D and F denote type names. Then, A B? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} >> works. >> A (B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes a NullPointerException. >> (A B)? C D{->MARK(F, 1, 4)} causes an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundException: -1. >> >> Any ideas? >> >> Cheers, >> Armin
