According to documentation for UimaFit 2.0 (http://uima.apache.org/d/uimafit- current/tools.uimafit.book.html), the method ConfigurationParameterFactory.createConfigurationParameterName() that was used to generate the prefixed name has been removed.
Does that mean the recommendation for naming parameters would be only the field name and no longer needed to be prefixed with the class name? What was the advantage of createConfigurationParameterName() then? I am still using uimafit 1.4 but I am considering removing all usages of ConfigurationParameterFactory.createConfigurationParameterName() from my codes if there are no serious implications of doing that.
