On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Luca, > > I believe the annotators that are provided in the UIMA Addons and > in the UIMA Sandbox are a rather loose and sometimes incoherent > collection. I believe this is partly an effect of the UIMA project > itself always rejecting to offer a default type system suggestion. > It seems to me that providing types and a coherent collection of > interoperable components has always been deferred to other projects. > > There are various UIMA component collections that each offer a > type system and a set of analysis components designed to work > with this type system. These components also tend to share other > common design traits, e.g. common parameters, approaches to view > handling, etc. > [...] > Maybe this can give you some further orientation if you are looking > for more a more coherent offer of analysis components. > > Thanks for the information, I've checked only U-Compare so far, but I definitely prefer to build something around Uima-fit. An important part of my discovery research is to get into problematic situation, because I'm trying to find weak parts in the integration process of different Annotator. [...] > Disclaimer: My own work is focussing on DKPro Core and uimaFIT. > :-) Cheers -- Luca Foppiano Software Engineer +31615253280 [email protected] www.foppiano.org
