I am using  LuCas in production in the last SNAPSHOT version that can be found 
in the SVN but not in the maven repository. I was also not aware a patch would 
be required to get it to work, I am using it in its current SVN state, 
including the splitter filter.
I would be willing to help with a migration and contribute to 
discussions/plans. However, I won't have time to do it all on my own, 
especially since I use it as a bridge to Solr/ElasticSearch that kind of 
remedies the version difference. Thus I use it with newer Solr/ES versions 
without problems so far.

I will be on vacations for two weeks, after that I'd be available for 
contributions.

Best,

Erik

> On 22 Aug 2014, at 15:36, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It would probably nice to migrate those to the current versions of 
> Lucene/Solr.
> 
> Jörn
> 
>> On 08/13/2014 08:44 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> Hi Renauld,
>> 
>> that's nice, thank you. Are you using Lucene 4.x or an older version?
>> 
>> It's a while ago, that I've asked that question and I didn't get much 
>> response. Is the project dead? Is it just to easy to code a simple annotator 
>> for Lucene or Solr to justify the effort maintaining Lucas and Solrcas?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Armin
>> 
>> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Renaud Richardet [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Gesendet: Montag, 11. August 2014 23:12
>> An: [email protected]
>> Betreff: Re: Lucas
>> 
>> Hi Armin,
>> 
>> I used it a while ago. I had to apply the following patch to make it work:
>> https://gist.github.com/renaud/bc34a48ca22f787f6c11
>> 
>> HTH, Renaud
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:55 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi!
>>> 
>>> Is someone using Lucas? It seems to be slightly outdated. It depends
>>> on Lucene 2.9.3. Lucene is at version 4.9.0 right now. Is there an 
>>> alternative?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Armin
>> 
>> --
>> Renaud Richardet
>> Blue Brain Project  PhD candidate
>> EPFL  Station 15
>> CH-1015 Lausanne
>> phone: +41-78-675-9501
>> http://people.epfl.ch/renaud.richardet
> 

Reply via email to