Hi Peter! There is no sarcasm at all. I really want to use Maven. It works fine for me. convention over configuration is a nice thing.
And I prefer programming/typing over clicking. It gives me more control, is more stable and such... Cheers, Armin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Peter Klügl [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. April 2015 15:34 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: Developing UIMA Ruta Rules in Maven Projects Hi Armin, I must admit that I am not sure if I interpeted your mail correctly. Discussions about the usability of maven could sometime lead to sarcasm. In case there are doubts if the Ruta Workbench will become less user-friendly, I can assure that the current functionality of the Ruta Workbench won't be touched and its users will not need to trouble themselves with maven. This is more about introducing an additional layer for developers to integrate ruta rules in their maven-based projects in a better and cleaner way. Best, Peter Am 01.04.2015 um 12:56 schrieb [email protected]: > Hi Peter! > >> Experienced developers would maybe only use maven-based ruta project in >> future and would not rely on the old Workspace projects at all. > Exactly, let me program it... > >> I assume that a user could convert a ruta project to a maven project and >> do the building by configuring the pom. Maybe the current builder should >> be deactived in the project then. > ... and let me use Maven, please. > > Cheers, > Armin
pgpK356U58kOP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
