After the changes of the last mail, the jar cotnains everything, when - I change the phase of the ruta-maven-plugin to process-resources - I set the outputDirectory for type system and analysis engine directly to target classes
Best, Peter Am 25.06.2015 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Klügl: > Some first observations... > > You should: > - remove all paths configs in your pom for the ruta-maven-plugin: > scriptPaths, descriptorPaths, resourcePaths > - remove the TypeSystem.xml file in the script folder > - remove build-helper-maven-plugin > > Now the generated descriptors should be correctly configured. However, > they are not part of the jar, but only of the sources jar. There is > something special about your maven build process which I haven't found > yet... > > Best, > > Peter > > Am 23.06.2015 um 19:41 schrieb Diego Buoro: >> Hello Peter, >> >> We would like to know how to configurate the line with the "import >> location" below, of MainTypeSystem.xml(which is genarated by the Ruta >> plugin by Maven), since in our present state, it is referecing to a file in >> two layers above of the desired. We searched in pom.xml,but we had no >> success. >> >> <typeSystemDescription xmlns="http://uima.apache.org/resourceSpecifier";> >> <name>MainTypeSystem</name> >> <imports> >> * <import location="../../../../../../descriptor/TypeSystem.xml"/>* >> </imports> >> ... >> >> No problem Peter, take your time.Thanks to you, we did a good progress :) >> >> All Best, >> >> Diego >> >> 2015-06-22 10:28 GMT-03:00 Peter Klügl <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I haven't checked all files in your project, but (without looking at it >>> right now) there are several TypeSystem.xml files. >>> If they are the same files (content), then I would recommend to have >>> only one of these files, e.g., in the descriptor folder. If these files >>> are different type systems, then I would recommend to give them a >>> different name. >>> >>> You do not need to change anything if all works as expected. >>> >>> I am a bit busy right now so that I can't give a more detailed advice >>> before the end of this week. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> Am 19.06.2015 um 21:31 schrieb Diego Buoro: >>>> Hi again, we managed to fix our problem with the features. Our main worry >>>> at the moment is: the problems that you mentioned about having duplicated >>>> type systems all over the place are still there. Can you recommend some >>>> reference that you think would be apropriate for fixing this in our >>>> project? If not, can you be a bit clearer on what you suggest we should >>> do? >>>> All Best, >>>> >>>> Diego >>>> >>>> 2015-06-19 15:55 GMT-03:00 Diego Buoro <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Hello, Peter, thanks for the suggestion as always :D >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately, our problems weren't solved. We tried removing all paths >>>>> from the configuration and we tried setting those paths as in the >>> example >>>>> project.In both cases we were eventually able to get the program >>> running, >>>>> but we were unable to import features from ruta annotations into java. >>> We >>>>> Don't know if that happened because of some problem in the configuration >>>>> itself or in the code (which seemed to be working before these >>>>> configuration problems started). Do you have any ideas? >>>>> >>>>> All Best, >>>>> >>>>> Diego >>>>>
