Hi Peter, good morning. Have we any opportunity to get a fixed version? I mean a snapshot or an access to the repo.
Regards 2017-02-22 10:38 GMT+01:00 José Vicente Moyano Murillo <[email protected]>: > you're right > > % is performing some kind of "or". > > So we will wait for the new release. > > Many thanks > > 2017-02-22 9:54 GMT+01:00 Peter Klügl <[email protected]>: > >> I actually wonder why your rules work. I am quite sure that they match >> too often, i. e. they match also if only one of the conjunct rule >> elements match. >> >> You can simply try that by using a wrong string in the check like "NG" >> instead of "Neil Gaiman" >> >> Anyways, the problem will be fixed in a few minutes and will be part of >> the next release. >> >> >> Best, >> >> >> Peter >> >> >> Am 22.02.2017 um 09:38 schrieb Peter Klügl: >> > Thanks. Maybe its just a bug in 2.5.0 I already fixed. I'll investigate >> it. >> > >> > >> > Am 22.02.2017 um 09:24 schrieb José Vicente Moyano Murillo: >> >> Thank you very much Peter. Your advice was amazing. >> >> >> >> We tried the first option using Conjunct rules and as you said it does >> not >> >> work with version 2.5.0. But we change a little your example and it >> works >> >> perfectly witn 2.4.0 and 2.5.0 >> >> >> >> We use theses examples with success: >> >> >> >> DECLARE Annotation RuleDetection; >> >> Book{ -> CREATE(NeilsBook) } <- { >> >> Attribute{Attribute.name=="title", Attribute.ct=="Norse >> Mythology"}" >> >> % >> >> Attribute{Attribute.name=="author", Attribute.ct=="Neil >> >> Gaiman"};" >> >> }; >> >> >> >> >> >> DECLARE Annotation RuleDetection; >> >> Book{ -> CREATE(NeilsBook) } <- { >> >> Attribute{FEATURE("name","title"), FEATURE("ct", "Norse >> Mythology")}" >> >> % >> >> Attribute{FEATURE("name","author"), FEATURE("ct", "Neil >> >> Gaiman")}; >> >> }; >> >> >> >> DECLARE Annotation RuleDetection; >> >> Book{ -> CREATE(NeilsBook) } <- { >> >> Attribute{Attribute.name=="title", Attribute.ct=="Norse >> Mythology"}" >> >> % >> >> Attribute{FEATURE("name","author"), FEATURE("ct", "Neil >> >> Gaiman")}; >> >> }; >> >> >> >> >> >> May be the problem is with when we use Identifiers: >> >> a1:Attribute and a2:Attribute >> >> >> >> In any case thank you very much for your help. >> >> >> >> >> >> 2017-02-21 17:46 GMT+01:00 Peter Klügl <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I'd normally say that you need the conjunt rules construct to specify >> an >> >>> AND between two rule element independent of the position: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Book{-> NeilsBook}<-{ >> >>> a1:Attribute{a1.name=="title", a1.ct=="Norse Mythology"} >> >>> % a2:Attribute{a2.name=="author", a2.ct=="Neil Gaiman"}; >> >>> }; >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> However, I just noted that there is a problem with conjunct rules. I >> >>> haven't used it in a long time and the test coverage much lower than >> the >> >>> other constructs. I'll create a ticket for it and fix it. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Without conjunct rules, you need some boolean variables for cheking >> the >> >>> AND, which looks all but declarative: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> BOOLEAN ft, fa; >> >>> FOREACH(book) Book{}{ >> >>> book{-> ft = false, fa = false}; >> >>> book->{a1:Attribute{a1.name=="title", a1.ct=="Norse Mythology"-> >> >>> ft=true};}; >> >>> book->{a2:Attribute{a2.name=="author", a2.ct=="Neil Gaiman"-> >> >>> fa=true};}; >> >>> book{ft,fa -> NeilsBook}; >> >>> } >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ... or with a BLOCK... >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> BLOCK(book) Book{}{ >> >>> Document{-> ft = false, fa = false}; >> >>> a1:Attribute{a1.name=="title", a1.ct=="Norse Mythology"-> >> ft=true}; >> >>> a2:Attribute{a2.name=="author", a2.ct=="Neil Gaiman"-> fa=true}; >> >>> Document{ft,fa -> NeilsBook}; >> >>> } >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> If the order of the attributes is known, you can avoid the AND check >> and >> >>> just specify a sequential constraint: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Book{-> NeilsBook}<-{ >> >>> a1:Attribute{a1.name=="title", a1.ct=="Norse Mythology"} >> >>> # a2:Attribute{a2.name=="author", a2.ct=="Neil Gaiman"}; >> >>> }; >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> If you need to check on the complete title with the URL, you can >> replace >> >>> the coveredText comparison with a REGEXP condition. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> (tested with UIMA Ruta 2.5.0) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Best, >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Peter >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Am 21.02.2017 um 13:58 schrieb José Vicente Moyano Murillo: >> >>>> Hello everyone >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm planning to use RUTA to create some annotations. But i'm not >> able to >> >>>> accomplish my objective. >> >>>> >> >>>> This is my case right now: >> >>>> >> >>>> I have a text annotated with some annotations "*Book*". >> >>>> >> >>>> Under "*Book*" annotation i have a few annotations "*Attribute*" that >> >>>> stores some information about the book. Each "*Attribute*" has a >> feature >> >>> " >> >>>> *name*" and a feature "*parent*" to its parent (one "*Book*" >> annotation). >> >>>> >> >>>> And example could be a text with 2 "*Book*" annotations: >> >>>> >> >>>> "*Book*" annotation number 1 with 3 nested attributes >> >>>> 1.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "title" -> covered text: >> "Norse >> >>>> Mythology >> >>>> <http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/norse-mythology-neil- >> >>> gaiman/1124023596;jsessionid=FD1D8F9690602616CA59B38CFE9290 >> >>> 06.prodny_store02-atgap08?ean=9780393609097> >> >>>> " >> >>>> 2.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "author" -> covered text: >> "Neil >> >>>> Gaiman" >> >>>> 3.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "language" - > covered text: >> >>>> "English" >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> "*Book*" annotation number 2 with 3 nested attributes >> >>>> 1.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "title" -> covered text: >> "Never >> >>>> Never >> >>>> <http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/never-never-james-patterson >> /1123863634; >> >>> jsessionid=FD1D8F9690602616CA59B38CFE929006.prodny_store02- >> atgap08?ean= >> >>> 9780316433174> >> >>>> " >> >>>> 2.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "author" -> covered text: >> >>> "James >> >>>> Patterson" >> >>>> 3.- *Attribute* with name feature equals "language" - > covered text: >> >>>> "English" >> >>>> >> >>>> I need to respect this schema but i have this question: >> >>>> It is possible to create and annotation over a book for a given >> author >> >>> name >> >>>> and a given title name? >> >>>> >> >>>> Thank's in advance >> >>>> >> >> >
