nope. sorry. -Marshall

On 2/9/2018 3:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> did you get an answer?
>
>
> Best,
>
>
> Peter
>
>
> Am 10.01.2018 um 17:12 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>> I'm pinging some people who might know something about LanguageWare's use of
>> this feature. -Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 1/10/2018 6:07 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 10.01.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Richard Eckart de Castilho:
>>>>> On 16.12.2017, at 13:48, Peter Klügl <peter.klu...@averbis.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it a problem for us to simply implement Matthias's solution: Make use
>>>>>> of the parameters in the PearSpecifier and just set them in the wrapped
>>>>>> analysis engine description if they are compatible?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Are there any opinions on this?
>>>> First, I was a bit confused and though the "PearSpecifier" would be
>>>> this guy here [1]. The I realized it is this one [2].
>>>>
>>>> Looking at where the parameters of the PearSpecifier are used: apparently 
>>>> the
>>>> setParameter and getParameter are only ever called directly in unit tests.
>>>>
>>>> Does it mean that the frameworks so far does not make any use of these 
>>>> parameter
>>>> as all? Or maybe they are used via some inherited methods...?
>>>>
>>>> It sounds reasonable to me that these parameters are forwarded to the 
>>>> top-level
>>>> component in the PEAR - the question I am asking myself is though: why 
>>>> doesn't
>>>> this already happen and (maybe) what else where these PearSpecifier 
>>>> parameters
>>>> intended to do then?
>>> Yes, these are exactly the questions we had :-)
>>>
>>> I rather wanted to ask twice before I open an issue or implement
>>> something. Could always be that I missed something. Initially, I thought
>>> that the IBM guys (LanguageWare) made massive use of the PEAR concept
>>> and they surely had some possibility to configure their PEARs.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> -- Richard
>>>>
>>>> [1] 
>>>> http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-current/references.html#ugr.ref.pear.installation_descriptor
>>>> [2] 
>>>> http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-current/references.html#ugr.ref.pear.specifier

Reply via email to