Hi,

yes, it is "[email protected]", sorry that I sent you the wrong
address.

xi:include is XML Inclusions AFAIK. Is there an official release for
that / do the docbook style sheets support these at all?

I will give docbook 5 a look later this week; however ATM I'm pretty
tight on time so it will not be an in-depth look, sorry.

The latest style sheets are available from the snapshots link below; the
latest released versions (at least for docbook 4) have errors with FOP
which the snapshot does not have.

        Best regards
                Henning


On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 12:10 +0100, Sam Wright wrote:
> Henning,
> Forwarding the mail below to you, as I can an error from the apache
> server about [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> S
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Wright 
> Sent: 21 May 2007 12:05
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Velocity DBF
> 
> Hi Henning,
> 
> Thanks for your mail. As you presumably know there are some differences
> in DB5, mainly use of a relaxng schema not a dtd. I think FOP will
> render DB5 output, however I have not managed to get it to do so myself.
> 
> The main problems I have is with <xi:include>, which I can't seem to get
> to work with 4.4, OR 5, using dbf or any other method. :-( Should
> xi:xinclude work with dbf?
> 
> The latest build you sent me exhibits the following errors:
> 
>      [java] Class file not found for option -URIResolver
>      [java] Class file not found for option -URIResolver
> 
> Not sure if you meant I had to wait for the latest xsl snapshot though?
> 
> Cheers
> S
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henning Schmiedehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 May 2007 20:10
> To: Sam Wright
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Velocity DBF
> 
> Hi Sam,
> 
> I haven't tried Docbook 5 myself and mainly I do not know whether the
> FOP is actually able to render the Docbook 5 output.
> 
> If you want to experiment with it, please add the actual Docbook 5 DTD
> to src/resolver/xml-catalox.xml; this should avoid the framework pulling
> the DTD definitions from the Internet.
> 
> The error messages you quoted are messages from the PDF renderer (Apache
> FOP), which can not render some of the FOP constructs. I have a more
> recent version in the trunk that does not report these messages. 
> 
> I've put you a snapshot of this version at
> people.apache.org/~henning/docbook-20070516.tar.gz
> 
> I am waiting for a new release of the xsl stylesheets for Docbook 4
> because currently I actually need to use a snapshot from
> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/snapshots/
> 
> I've noted that there is also a recent docbook5 snapshot, maybe this
> will help you with Docbook 5.
> 
> Lastly: I've copied this message to the velocity users list at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please send your replies to this list so that
> others can participate and benefit from our discussion. Thanks.
> 
>       Best regards
>               Henning
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 14:30 +0100, Sam Wright wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Sam Wright, a tech writer in the UK here. I'm looking at possible 
> > docbook solutions, and so far yours looks superior to anything else I 
> > have found (looked at aphid, dopus, ede, etc). DBF worked pretty much 
> > out of the box on Windows as well. Nice one!
> > 
> > Ideally I'd like to be using Docbook5 (I know is it still only a RC) 
> > and the xi:include syntax, which of course does not work with the 
> > current
> > 4.4 stylesheet in DBF. If I replace the zip files with an equivalent
> > DB5 zip, and change the version number in the properties file is that 
> > likely to work?
> > 
> > I also get a load of somewhat inelegant error messages when producing 
> > pdf (with DB4.4 about properties not yet implemented, not sure if this
> 
> > is due to my setup, or windows or what?
> > 
> >      [java] [ERROR] property - "background-position-horizontal" is not
> 
> > implemented yet.
> >      [java] [ERROR] property - "background-position-vertical" is not 
> > implemented yet.
> >     ...
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Sam
> > 
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > This message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs
> Virus Scanning Service, on behalf of Celoxica Ltd.
> > 
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may 
> > be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the 
> > individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received 
> > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
> > immediately. Whilst this email has been swept for viruses, you should 
> > carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. Celoxica
> 
> > Ltd accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by
> 
> > software viruses or interception or interruption of this email.
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This incoming message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> Messagelabs Scanning System, on behalf of Celoxica Ltd.
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus 
> Scanning Service, on behalf of Celoxica Ltd.
> 
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
> may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the 
> individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received 
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 
> immediately. Whilst this email has been swept for viruses, you 
> should carry out your own virus check before opening any 
> attachment. Celoxica Ltd accepts no liability for any loss or 
> damage which may be caused by software viruses or interception 
> or interruption of this email.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to