Yeah, macros actually got a lot more expensive (especially in memory)
in 1.5.  1.6.2 resolved most of those issues. :)

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Jude Robinson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Expensive in cycles or memory?  And in what version?  Much
>>> optimization has been done, and i've yet to notice trouble in 1.6+ (at
>>> least compared to previous).
>>
>> Sorry, should have stated the version: 1.6.2
>
> <pokes around a bit />
> <sigh />
>
> Scratch that: 1.5
>
> Sorry. Ignore. No problems here.
>
> <trots off to upgrade />
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to