On 24/05/2010, Will Glass-Husain <wglasshus...@gmail.com> wrote: > This isn't true. > > Maybe someone has built as JSR-223 library that uses Velocity? Not within > the Apache Velocity project.
OK, thanks. Yes, I think they must have meant that a JSR-223 factory is available. > There's certainly been no activity within Apache Velocity to run the TCK, > which (I assume) would be required to announce compliance. Not sure it's necessary to run a TCK on a factory implementation. Is there any interest in adding one to Velocity? I wrote one for Jexl2 - only two classes are needed plus a property file. Should not be too hard to do. Whether it would be useful or not, I don't know. > I'd speculate that someone noticed you can call java methods from Velocity > pages and made a wild leap that it supports JSR-223. > > WILL > > > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:51 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The following document: > > > > > > > https://dev.deri.ie/confluence/display/romulus/JSR+223+compliant+scripting+languages#JSR223compliantscriptinglanguages-Velocity > > > > says that Velocity implements JSR-223. > > > > I could not find a reference to this on the Velocity web-site, so > > perhaps the page is wrong. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@velocity.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@velocity.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@velocity.apache.org