--- karthik Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You guys have to correct me. In XDoclet 1.x, in > order to prevent accidental procesing of a generated > file, the template would place @xdoclet-generated > tag in the generated source file? I dont remeber > exactly how that worked. But I guess every file that > had that tag would be excluded automatically? Yes. > Is that encouraged in the 2.0 version as well? > I know that i can override shouldGenerate() and > check for this tag and return false. But it w'dnt be > standardized across all plugins that way. Good question... but: 1. You could need to process generated files again with another plugin 2. Qdox parser is way cheaper than xjavadoc - so there is not a big demand to cull source set. 3. generated files are usually placed in another directory so there is no mixup possible > Another question - > > XDoclet 1.x i guess generated the ' Do Not Edit ' > comment in the source file from a properties file. I > thought all comments in the generated file supported > i18n?. Does it make sense in XDoclet 2.0 as well? This was done via externalizer module in xd1, and guess what - there is externalizer plugin for XD2 having the same functionality. It will generate property bundle & message lookup for you. regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda ( ko5tik ) ]---------------- ... Auf der Suche nach einen Projekt in Rhein-Main ab 18.4.2005 ----[ http://www.pribluda.de ]------------------------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
