Adding support of join is not limited by adding join-property. We also
should define <key> for <join> in some way.
And I am not completely sure what xdoclet tags should be introduced
because of I have never used <join> before.

Anyway please open a ticket in JIRA for this issue.

On 6/15/05, Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo Andreas, du bist in der falschen Liste.
> Es gibt eine Speziell f�r Plugins.  Diese ist
> nur f�r XDoclet.
> 
> > i have a small problem with join tables in xdoclet
> > 2. i have a class
> > mapping that contains the following join table
> > mapping (works fine
> > with hibernate 3.0) :
> >
> >     <join table="BA2_R_GESCHAEFT_VW" optional="true"
> > inverse="false"
> > fetch="join">
> >       <key>
> >         <column name="BANK_ID" scale="3"
> > precision="0" not-null="true"
> > sql-type="NUMBER" />
> >         <column name="STICHTAG" scale="8"
> > precision="0" not-null="true"
> > sql-type="NUMBER" />
> >         <column name="LAUFKENNUNG_NR" scale="2"
> > precision="0"
> > not-null="true" sql-type="NUMBER" />
> >         <column name="KONTO_NR" scale="15"
> > precision="0" not-null="true"
> > sql-type="NUMBER" />
> >         <column name="KONTO_NR_SUB" scale="15"
> > precision="0" not-null="true"
> > sql-type="NUMBER" />
> >       </key>
> >       <property name="istKurzfristig"
> > type="java.lang.Boolean">
> >         <column name="IST_KURZFRISTIG" scale="1"
> > precision="0"
> > not-null="false" sql-type="NUMBER" />
> >       </property>
> >   </join>
> >
> > problem is, that
> > i have no idea how to tell xdoclet 2 that the
> > property "istKurzfristig"
> > has to be within the join tag. xdoclet always adds
> > the property
> > tag to the class tag that surrounds the join tag.
> > Looking at the
> > Join.jelly file it looks like it is not possible to
> > add properties
> > to the join table tag, which makes the join tag
> > impossible to use
> > with xdoclet 2, or did i miss something ?
> 
> AFAIR currently @hibernate.property tag will not
> support this. I think @hibernate.joined-property shall
> be introduced to support this ( same params as
> @hibernate.property, with table-name added )
> 
> stay tuned while we investigate this matter :)
> ( you could await fresh snapshot today )
> 
> regards,
-- 
anatol

Reply via email to