Do you have the corresponding wsdl at hand?
In my perfect world it wouldn't be there...
M.
Franz Garsombke schrieb:
Thanks Mika. One other question...I just noticed the SOAP looks like this:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><soap:Envelope
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";><soap:Body><in0
xmlns="http://soap.level3.com";><DoExecuteRequestResult
xmlns="http://www.soap.level3.com";><name>test1Name</name></DoExecuteRequestResult></in0></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
Where does the 'in0' come from?
Thanks,
Franz
*/Mika G�ckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* wrote:
Franz, just a small thought:
You test value == null, but you did a value.getClass() before... to
avoid an NPE, you should test value == null earlier.
Mika
Franz Garsombke schrieb:
> I have this working now. I extended AegisBindingProvider and
overrode
> the following method. The type mapping is retrieved from the Object
> value coming in. It works pretty smoothly. I will document this
on the
> website.
>
> public void writeParameter(MessagePartInfo p, XMLStreamWriter
> writer, MessageContext context, Object value)
> throws XFireFault {
> Type type =
>
getTypeMapping(context.getService()).getTypeCreator().createType(value.getClass());
> MessageWriter mw = new ElementWriter(writer);
> if (type.isNillable() && value == null) {
> mw.writeXsiNil();
> return;
> }
> context.setProperty(CURRENT_MESSAGE_PART, p);
> type.writeObject(value, mw, context);
> }
>
> Thanks,
>
> Franz
> */Franz Garsombke /* wrote:
>
> Allright...so I have the new transport and channel classes created
> that basically just return the SOAP request as a String. This can
> then be used to post to a JMS topic, etc. We don't want to be
> bound to a 'JMS Transport'.
>
> I have one more thing that I need to figure out. We would much
> rather call send(Object obj) then send(MyDataType dataType). The
> problem with that is the first signature creates an exception
> because the schema type of ObjectType is created versus an
> XmlBeansType. I have tracked this down to the
> XmlBeansTypeCreator.createType method. My question is...if I had a
> signature like send(Object obj, Class classType) how can I use
> classType as the class that is used by the TypeCreator vs. clazz =
> m.getParameterTypes()[index]; ? If this isssue can be resolved we
> can have a generic SOAP request creator versus having to maintain
> a Service class with dozens of send(MyDataType dataType) methods.
> It looks like I might have to tweak the AegisBindingProvider
> getParameterType(TypeMapping tm, MessagePartInfo param, int
> paramtype) so that when it calls type =
> tm.getTypeCreator().createType(op.getMethod(), param.getIndex());
> I can pass in more than the Method and parameter. How can I pass
> the class type I know ahead of time into this whole mechanism?
>
> Thanks again for a great framework. After this piece is solved
> both ways (taking in a String SOAP request and creating a String
> SOAP request with full marshalling) will be complete.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Franz
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Brings words and photos together (easily) with
> PhotoMail
>
> - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
--
cyber:con gmbh
Mika G�ckel
Rathausallee 10
53757 Sankt Augustin
tel (+49)2241 / 9350 0
fax (+49)2241 / 9350 99
mob (+49) 172 / 279 2771
skype mika.goeckel
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/virusall/*http://communications.yahoo.com/features.php?page=221>
helps detect nasty viruses!
--
cyber:con gmbh
Mika Göckel
Rathausallee 10
53757 Sankt Augustin
tel (+49)2241 / 9350 0
fax (+49)2241 / 9350 99
mob (+49) 172 / 279 2771
skype mika.goeckel
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
