Chris:

These are definitely legitimate. Thanks for investigating this. I consider
this a critical problem and I am working to get 1.2.6 cut by Sunday. I
screwed things up last minute on the 1.2.5 release. Many apologies, and
we'll get this fixed ASAP!

- Dan


On 3/15/07, Christopher Moesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 So are these then legitimate bugs that I should file in JIRA?  Has anyone
successfully done what I described below in XFire 1.2.5?

- create a wsdl-first service using JAXWSServiceFactory

- create a wsdl-first service with schema types defined in a separate
namespace?



-Chris



-----Original Message-----
*From:* Christopher Moesel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:47 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [xfire-user] A Couple of XFire 1.2.5 Bugs w/ WSDL-first
services?



OK—just converted my implementation to use the new interface generated by
XFire 1.2.5.  Overall, refactoring the API implementation wasn't too bad.



But I ran into a few issues that I haven't been able to resolve.  This is
a WSDL-first service.  It uses one namespace (
http://mycompany.com/myservice) for the soap message definitions,
operation definitions, etc, and another namespace (
http://mycompany.com/myservice/types) for all of the types defined in the
XML Schema.  Running in Tomcat 5.5 on JDK5.



ISSUE #1:



I am using a Spring configuration.  I was using the JAXWSServiceFactory as
showcased in the jaxws-spring example in the XFire distribution:



<bean name="xfire.jaxwsServiceFactory" class="
org.codehaus.xfire.jaxws.JAXWSServiceFactory">

  <constructor-arg ref="xfire.transportManager" />

</bean>



<bean name="MyService" class="org.codehaus.xfire.spring.ServiceBean">

  <!—serviceBean, serviceClass, wsdlURL, and handlers go here -->

  <property name="serviceFactory">

    <ref bean="xfire.jaxwsServiceFactory" />

  </property>

</bean>



This worked perfectly in 1.2.4.  But in 1.2.5, it fails on startup.  I get
an XFireRuntimeException, caused by a NullPointerException:



org.codehaus.xfire.XFireRuntimeException: Couldn't load provider.. Nested
exception is java.lang.NullPointerException: null

java.lang.NullPointerException

            at org.codehaus.xfire.jaxb2.JaxbTypeCreator.isJaxbType(
JaxbTypeCreator.java:92)

            at
org.codehaus.xfire.jaxws.type.JAXWSTypeCreator.createTypeForClass(
JAXWSTypeCreator.java:31)

            at
org.codehaus.xfire.jaxws.type.JAXWSTypeCreator.createHolderType(
JAXWSTypeCreator.java:51)

            at
org.codehaus.xfire.aegis.type.AbstractTypeCreator.createTypeForClass(
AbstractTypeCreator.java:101)

            at
org.codehaus.xfire.jaxws.type.JAXWSTypeCreator.createTypeForClass(
JAXWSTypeCreator.java:38)

            … plenty more stack trace available if anyone wants it …



ISSUE #2:



Since that failed, I opted to try using the JaxbServiceFactory instead
(since this is the ServiceFactory used in the generated services.xml file,
and since I had also successfully tested using this factory in 1.2.4).  I
configured it like so (and changed the appropriate reference in the service
bean):



<bean name="xfire.jaxb2ServiceFactory" class="
org.codehaus.xfire.jaxb2.JaxbServiceFactory">

  <constructor-arg ref="xfire.transportManager" />

</bean>



Again, this worked in 1.2.4.  In 1.2.5, it appears to deploy fine
(hurray!).  But when my test clients try to interact with it, I notice a
problem:  The wrapper element of the response (the first element under the
soap:Body) is in the wrong namespace!  Instead of being in the
http://mycompany.com/myservice/types namespace, it is in the
http://mycompany.com/myservice namespace (which is the namespace of the
soap messages, operations, etc).



If I look at the generated ObjectFactory class, I note that in the private
final static QName section at the top, the namespace in the QName is right:



private final static QName _MyOperationResponse_QNAME = new QName("
http://mycompany.com/myservice/types";, "MyOperationResponse");



Likewise, if I look at the methods at the bottom of the class, the
namespace in the annotations appears correct as well:



@XmlElementDecl(namespace = "http://mycompany.com/myservice/types ", name
= "MyOperationResponse")

public JAXBElement<MyOperationResponseType>
createMyOperationResponse(MyOperationResponseType value) {

    return new
JAXBElement<MyOperationResponseType>(_MyOperationResponse_QNAME,
MyOperationResponseType.class, null, value);

}



But, as mentioned above, the returned soap response uses the namespace:
http://mycompany.com/myservice.



ISSUE #3:



I attempted to build the jaxws-spring example in the 1.2.5 distribution,
but the build failed.  I was using the command "mvn –e install".  Here is
the beginning of the stack trace I got from the log file:




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test set: org.something.services.hello.test.HelloServiceTestCase


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.157 sec
<<< FAILURE!

warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1)  Time elapsed: 0 sec  <<< FAILURE!

junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Exception in constructor:
testViaXFireServer (
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating
bean with name 'hello.client' defined in class path resource [
client.beans.xml]: Initialization of bean failed; nested exception is
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: URI is not absolute

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: URI is not absolute

            at java.net.URI.toURL(URI.java:1080)

            at
org.codehaus.xfire.spring.remoting.XFireClientFactoryBean.makeClient(
XFireClientFactoryBean.java:504)

            at
org.codehaus.xfire.spring.remoting.XFireClientFactoryBean.createClient(
XFireClientFactoryBean.java:412)

            at
org.codehaus.xfire.spring.remoting.XFireClientFactoryBean.afterPropertiesSet
(XFireClientFactoryBean.java:119)

            … more stack trace available if anyone wants/needs it …



Hopefully these are easy problems to fix (or hopefully I'm just doing
something wrong)…  if not, I may have to go back to 1.2.4 (and roll back
my API changes).



Thanks!

Chris




--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Reply via email to