Anyone have any ideas on this?  It seems to me it's a defect in XFire
that creates the service definition or generates the WSDL (or a
supporting library).  Can anyone point me to the code that performs
these functions so I can begin debugging this?  This is a huge problem
as clients can not inspect the WSDL due to it being invalid.

Thanks.

On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 13:29 -0400, Eric Miles wrote:

> This is an odd problem that I'm having a hard time tracking down.  I
> am doing schema first development, generating Impl classes with JAXB2.
> I'm using Xfire 1.2.5, Spring 2.0, and JAXB2.  I have my schema
> defined as such:
> 
> <xsd:element name="SyncLeave" type="ns:SyncLeavePremPay" />
> 
> <xsd:element name="SyncPremPay" type="ns:SyncLeavePremPay" />
> 
> <xsd:complexType name="SyncLeavePremPay">
> <xsd:sequence>
> <xsd:element name="Error" type="ns:Error" minOccurs="0"
> maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> <xsd:element name="InsLeavePrem" type="ns:InsLeavePrem"
> minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"></xsd:element>
> </xsd:sequence>
> </xsd:complexType>
> 
> 
> My interface as such:
> 
> @WebMethod(operationName = "SyncLeave")
> @WebResult( name = "SyncLeave" )
> public SyncLeavePremPay syncLeave(
> @WebParam(name = "SyncLeave")SyncLeavePremPay body);
> 
> @WebMethod(operationName = "SyncPremPay")
> @WebResult( name = "SyncPremPay" )
> public SyncLeavePremPay syncPremPay(
> @WebParam(name = "SyncPremPay")SyncLeavePremPay body);
> 
> However, when I use XFire to generate my WSDL based on the interface
> and my provided schema, XFire is adding duplicate elements for
> SyncLeave and SyncPremPay
> 
> At the end of the schema I have provided, it seems as though XFire is
> entering it's own definition for these 2 elements as seen here:
> 
> ...
> </xsd:complexType> 
> 
>       </xsd:element>
> 
> <xsd:element name="SyncLeave" type="tns:SyncLeavePremPay"/>
> <xsd:element name="SyncPremPay" type="tns:SyncLeavePremPay"/>
> </xsd:schema>
> 
> Keep in mind, these 2 elements are already defined further up in my schema.  
> Why is XFire doing this?

Reply via email to