>From Earlier Post.....
MessageContext ctx = AbstractInvoker.getContext();
ctx.getContextualProperty("YOUR_KEY");
> <service>
> ... define your normal attributes ...
> <properties>
> <property key="YOUR_KEY">datasourceinfo</property>
> <properties>
> </service>
___________________________________________
Gavin Hogan
Programmer/Analyst
The State University of New York
State University Plaza
Albany, NY 12246
Phone 518-443-5481
fax 518-443-5809
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Clive George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 3:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [xfire-user] Service class configuration
> Hi -
>
> Probably a mind-numbingly simple question, but I can't work it out..
>
> I've got my simple xfire (1.2.6) service working - a service with
> name, serviceClass and implementationClass specified in services.xml.
>
> I'd now like to configure that service a bit - eg specify database
> information, etc. Now I could make the implementationClass query that
> from somewhere, but I know it should be possible to do this via some
> IoC mechanism, which given xfire uses Spring, I'm guessing is
> preferred.
>
> I've seen Spring examples of how to do this, but am wondering if I can
> configure this somehow via the services.xml. Or do I have to not use
> services.xml, and instead configure xfire a bit more explicitly via
> Spring?
>
> (or indeed am I asking entirely the wrong question?)
Hi -
Anybody got any ideas at all about this? I'm guessing by the lack of
response that I may be starting in the wrong place : anybody got any
ideas where I should be starting?
I like the idea of making SOAP type web services out of POJOs, which is
what XFire appears to do. But any web service which actually does
something will require a certain amount of configuration, and dependency
injection seems an appropriate way to do this. Unfortunately I don't
really know where to start here - I can see how to get the POJO, but I
can't see how to tell it stuff to use which isn't part of the SOAP
interface (whether it be simple properties or a configuration class).
Any clues would be much appreciated - or do I just go back to
singletons?
cheers,
clive
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
