>From the XFire main page:

XFire is now CXF

User's looking to use XFire on a new project, should use CXF instead. CXF is
a continuation of the XFire project and is considered XFire 2.0. It has many
new features, a ton of bug fixes, and is now JAX-WS compliant! XFire will
continue to be maintained through bug fix releases, but most development
will occur on CXF now. For more information see the XFire/Celtix merge FAQ
and the CXF website.


Phil Gibbs wrote:
> 
> It seems to me that XFire is not as popular as frameworks such as Axis. 
> Certainly, the Nabble forum has much less traffic than I'd expect, and
> there are many questions to which there are no responses.  To me, that
> doesn't give me a lot of confidence in the long-term viability of XFire.
> Don't misunderstand me.  I'm a enthusiastic user and I consider it to be a
> very good framework.  However, the documentation is sparse and very
> minimal and there seem to be too many bugs reported.  Surprising for what
> should be a mature product.  AFAIK, no books have been published - no I'm
> not about to write one.  Has the XFire team moved on to something else?
> What does everyone else think?  Do we XFirers have a tool with a future?
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/XFire-Traction-tp15126810p15127008.html
Sent from the XFire - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to