> Well, obviously, if you provide the implementation classes yourself, > then you are not really using XmlBeans anymore
Is there no way to redirect the bean implementation and maintain use of the XMLBeans framework. I would imagine this would be an extremely powerful paradigm. I'm not interested in replacing the xmlbeans marshalling framework, but being able to implement the bean interface on other classes and marshal directly to them (e.g. an ejb) would be fantastically powerful. On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 14:23 -0700, Radu Preotiuc wrote: > Well, obviously, if you provide the implementation classes yourself, > then you are not really using XmlBeans anymore for runtime and you can't > rely on XmlBeans to do the parsing. > You can add your own code to the generated XmlBeans using the extension > feature, as described in > http://wiki.apache.org/xmlbeans/ExtensionInterfacesFeature > > Radu > > From: Adam Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: runtime specify implementing class? > Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:48:29 +1000 > > Hi All, > > I've just learning XMLBeans 2.0. I've notice that xmlbeans creates > element interfaces and an implementation. Is it possible (and is there > any doco anyone can point me at) to change the implementation class > (i.e. to implement the generated interface with my own class) and parse > using that instead of the default implementation? > > Cheers > Adam > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
