Thanks for the replies - I'll try to address both in this message.
1) I was just using print(foo) as short-hand. The xmlText is still
<xml-fragment>...</xml-fragment> ( I was really doing
System.out.println("footext = " + foo) )
2) In xmlbeans 2.0.0 there is no FooDocument.Foo.Factory chain of
objects; at least not for these schemas. (You can find the schema I'm
using at OASIS for DSML -
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/dsml/docs/DSMLv2.xsd)
Basically, a DsmlAttr is used in a number of different Request objects,
e.g. AddRequest. So we have AddRequestDocument, and AddRequest, as Java
types, but no DsmlAttrDocument.
Further, there is no AddRequestDocument.AddRequest.Factory chain in 2.0.0.
Is there an API changes document from 1.0 to 2.0 document somewhere?
Thanks again - I really do appreciate the replies.
--Kent
Caroline Wood wrote:
I think what you need to do is:
FooDocument fooDocument = FooDocument.Factory.newInstance();
FooDocument.Foo foo = FooDocument.Foo.Factory.newInstance();
foo.setName("blah blah");
fooDocument.setFoo(foo);
print(fooDocument);
Give at a go and let us know what happens!
Best,
Caroline.
-----Original Message-----
From: Don Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 July 2005 09:59
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Creating complexType objects...
Kent,
In the first example replace print(foo); with print(foo.xmlText());
Regards
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 July 2005 19:48
To: [email protected]
Subject: Creating complexType objects...
I've looked over all the doc, and archives, and haven't found if there's
an easier to do what I'd like in XmlBeans 2.0.0.
It looks like to create an XmlObject that has a name other than
"xml-fragment" in the first element, you need to go through an object
type that contains that type.
i.e. If I have Foo defined as a type with just a name attribute:
Foo foo = Foo.Factory.newInstance();
foo.setName("name");
print(foo);
gives:
<xml-fragment name="name"/>
If I want <foo name="name"/> as the xml - I need to find a type (let's
call it Bar) that encloses the Foo type and do:
Bar bar = Bar.Factory.newInstance();
Foo foo = bar.addNewFoo();
foo.setName("name");
foo.set(bar);
now foo is:
<foo name="name"/>
Is this really what's required?
If this made no sense; I can send a more concrete example.
Thanks for the help,
--Kent
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an email from the CPP Group Plc, Holgate Park, York, YO26 4GA;
telephone 01904 544500.
This message may contain information that is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient,
you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you
have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or
telephone and either
return or destroy the original message.
The CPP Group Plc accepts no responsibility for any changes made to this
message after it has been
sent by the original author. This email has been scanned for all viruses by
the MessageLabs Email Security System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
