Thanks for the ides.

I looked at the extension interfaces, but I'm not sure how they would apply.
As I understand it, these allow me to have generated classes implement my
own custom interface.  The example talks about doing this with methods; I
suppose I could try providing an interface with no methods but the static
fields I would like.  Maybe something like:

public interface DestinationTypeEnums
{
    static final DestinationType.Enum US_Domestic = DestinationType.A;
    static final DestinationType.Enum US_Territories = DestinationType.B;
    static final DestinationType.Enum Foreign = DestinationType.C;
}

I could then either specify the implementation object as null or provide an
empty dummy class called DestinationTypeEnumsImpl.

It might work, although I sense a circularity in there somewhere.  I'll give
it a try, if for no other reason than curiosity.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Skells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 1:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Changing enumeration names

Could this be done with a extension interfaces
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlbeans/ExtensionInterfacesFeature defining an
extension to do the enum mapping for each enum type

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Smalley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 14 October 2005 02:46
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Changing enumeration names
> 
> Thanks for the response and information.  The example I gave 
> was very simple, to make clear what I wanted.  Actually, I am 
> using XMLBeans to wrap the Universal Business Language (UBL 
> 1.0) schemas, which have enumerations with nearly 100 values, 
> for example, "30" (maps to X_30) can mean "Buyer disagrees 
> with due date" or "AF" can mean "U.S. Defense Switched Network".
> I just don't think a comment will work, so I will be writing 
> some scripts to do the renaming.
> 
> Incidentally, the definitions are contained in the schema 
> annotation elements, so a method of selecting sub elements of 
> <annotation> with XPath and injecting their content into the 
> javadoc comments would also be nice :).
> 
> Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Radu Preotiuc-Pietro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 6:17 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Changing enumeration names
> 
> Unfortunately, the level of customization allowed by 
> .xsdconfig is currently not finely grained enough to make it 
> possible to rename enumeration fields, so I am afraid you are 
> stuck using "A", "B" and "C".
> I wouldn't go to all the trouble of changing the generated 
> code if I were you, I would just add a comment when using it.
> 
> Radu
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Smalley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 11:08 AM
> To: XMLBeans
> Subject: Changing enumeration names
> 
> 
> I have a schema which defines the following simple type:
> 
> <xsd:simpleType name="DestinationType">
>   <xsd:restriction base="xsd:normalizedString">
>     <xsd:enumeration value="A"/>
>     <xsd:enumeration value="B"/>
>     <xsd:enumeration value="C"/>
>   </xsd:restriction>
> </xsd:simpleType>
> 
> This generates the appropriate java class "DestinationType" with enum
> fields A, B, and C.  The point is, these values are correct, 
> because the
> document requires their use (per the schema), but they're meanings are
> actually:
> 
> A - US Domestic
> B - US Territories
> C - Foreign
> 
> I would rather have enum fields in the generated type like 
> US_Domestic,
> US_Territories, and Foreign; in other words, defined as:
> 
> static final Enum US_Domestic = Enum.forString("A");
> static final Enum US_Territories = Enum.forString("B");
> static final Enum Foreign = Enum.forString("C");
> 
> I have looked in the FAQ and searched the mailing list.  The FAQ says
> the "xb:qname" element in an xsdconfig file can be used to 
> map elements
> and attributes as well as types, but I haven't figured out 
> how to do it
> or found any examples.
> 
> Is there any way to force scomp to rename enumerations like 
> this, or am
> I stuck editing the generated code and then re-compiling?  Thanks in
> advance for any insights.
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to