You
are right, I couldn't find it either. I meant to do an update to the information
that's on the website currently; haven't gotten to it yet, but it will be
added.
Thanks,
Radu
-----Original Message-----Ah, that makes sense.
From: rabidgremlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 6:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Set vs Add methods
Was that behavior documented anywhere ? I did not see it :)
Jonathan
On 10/18/05, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:In order not to have side effects on its argument, add(FooType foo)
methods add a copy of foo rather than the foo you supply. Subsequent
modifications of foo will then have no effect on the copy. The
particular change would be changing the parent xml object. I find
using add much more convenient.
thanks
david jencks
