I think it's a scomp bug and we need to report this.
I ran into this problem before, I was lucky enough to be able to change the
schema so
that I don't need to have extension and restriction running in the same
line without losing
much of my business logic. Don't know whether it's possible in your case.
Thanks!
Qian
Holger Rieß
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.ag> To
[email protected]
12/16/2005 10:13 cc
AM
Subject
Re: scomp problem with complextype
Please respond to and simplecontent
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
che.org
Hi Qian,
the definition of dtMLSTRING is
<xsd:complexType name="dtMLSTRING">
<xsd:simpleContent>
<xsd:extension base="dtSTRING">
<xsd:attribute name="lang"
type="dtLANG" use="optional"/>
</xsd:extension>
</xsd:simpleContent>
</xsd:complexType>
...
<xsd:simpleType name="dtSTRING">
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:simpleType>
...
Thanks
Holger
(See attached file: holger.riess.vcf)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message contains information from Equifax Inc. which may be
confidential and privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, please
refrain from any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
information and note that such actions are prohibited. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify by e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
holger.riess.vcf
Description: Binary data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
