This looks like a classloader issue, specifically make sure that all XmlBeans-generated JARs (including the one containing the .xsb files) are on junit's classpath.
Radu -----Original Message----- From: Edward Frederick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 1:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Strange Type Resolution Error New development: I tried to instead directly instantiate the document type I want, and a curious error happens in case#2: The document is not a [EMAIL PROTECTED]://my.site/foo: document element namespace mismatch expected "http://my.site/foo"; got "" But that's strange, since I never had problems before, and my document clearly uses the NS: <foo xmlns="http://my.site/foo";> <document-name>name</document-name> </foo> XSD specifies element form qualified. But again, I never had problems when inside tomcat. All the elements are there, because if I replace the doc element with a qualified QName it works (well, initially... until it complains about the child elements being unqualified). Damn namespaces. Thanks! Ed On 2/1/06, Edward Frederick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > XMLBeans is working great for me, thank you to all contributors. > > I'm having a strange problem: > > When run within Tomcat (types are within a jar file in WEB-INF/lib): > > XmlObject enclosure = (XmlObject)XmlObject.Factory.parse(someFooDom); > > enclosure.getClass().getName() = my.xmlbeans.package.FooDocument (as > expected) > > > When run outside of Tomcat (i.e. say when used within a JUnit test, > generated JARs are still inside classpath): > > > XmlObject enclosure = (XmlObject)XmlObject.Factory.parse(someFooDom); > > enclosure.getClass().getName() = > org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.values.XmlAnyTypeImpl > > > I verified that the passed documents are exactly the same. Does this > mean that in the second scenerio XMLBeans can't 'see' my schemas and > corresponding beans? Any ideas on how I can figure out why my document > isn't been 'seen' as a FooDocument? > > > I know this is a vague issue, but I'm hoping somewhere out there has > an 'aha' moment. > > Thanks so much, > > Ed > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
