Hi Lawrence The comparing means that I wrote a compare-method that takes the nodes which are received by "getDomNode()" as argument. As true is the right answer even if those nodes are not equal but one is just "more" than the other and there might be more content than defined in the schema, this seemed like a good idea to me.
And again I am nearly done writing this mail and I get the point where I made the mistake. As soon as I learn to think hard enough without the intention to explain to someone I will stop bothering you for sure... Thanks Ramin > Hi Ramin > > Hmmm - I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "comparing ... based on > the W3C-nodes" and the XML definitely changed name in the test code I > ran. Could you send your code (or preferably a small test scenario) > and > the schema and I'll try and take a look at it? > > Cheers, > > Lawrence > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ramin Roham-Pour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:48 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: substituting simple types > > > > Hi Lawrence > > > > I tried this out and basically it works, but there is still a > > problem. > > I am comparing my stuff based on the W3C-nodes and those nodes are > still > > named "base..." while the xml I want to compare them to never uses > thos > > basetypes. > > Maybe I could change the comparemethod, but the instances I send the > xml > > to seem to have problem with the use of basetypes and thats > > definitly > > out of my reach. > > > > Is there any solution to this? > > > > Ramin > > > > > > > > Am Fr 03.03.2006 20:03 schrieb Lawrence Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Hi Ramin > > > > > > You can substitute even simple types - David Bau, one of the > original > > > designers of XmlBeans, thought of this (it's discussed in 3 > > > articles > > > called "The Design of XMLBeans" parts 1, 2 and 3 - there are links > to > > > these articles at > > > http://xmlbeans.apache.org/resources/index.html). > > > > > > To substitute this you need to get hold of what David calls the > > > "formal" > > > type - in this case an instance of XmlString instead of just > > > String. > > > > > > There are special methods on the generated beans that allow you to > get > > > (and set) through formal types. Instead of being getXXX()/setXXX > they > > > are xgetXXX() and xsetXXX(). So in your case you want code that > looks > > > something like this: > > > > > > XmlString initialBaseState = tt.xgetBaseState(); > > > QName troubleStateQName = > > > new QName("your_target_namespace", "troubleState"); > > > TroubleState troubleState = > > > (TroubleState)initialBaseState.substitute(troubleStateQName, > > > TroubleState.type); > > > troubleState.set(TroubleState.UNKNOWNTROUBLESTATE); > > > > > > I tried that out on a simple schema based on your fragment and > > > that > > > all > > > works for me - so let me know if you have problems. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Lawrence > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Ramin Roham-Pour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 6:48 AM > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: substituting simple types > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > I my schema it reads: > > > > > > > > <complexType name="TroubleTicketValue" abstract="false"> > > > > <complexContent> > > > > <extension base="co:ManagedEntityValue"> > > > > <sequence> > > > > <element ref="tt:baseState" nillable="true" > > > minOccurs="0"/> > > > > </sequence> > > > > </extension> > > > > </complexContent> > > > > </complexType> > > > > > > > > <element name="baseState" type="string"/> > > > > > > > > <element name="troubleState" type="tt:TroubleState" > > > > substitutionGroup="tt:baseState"/> > > > > > > > > <simpleType name="TroubleState"> > > > > <restriction base="string"> > > > > <enumeration value="UNKNOWNTROUBLESTATE"/> > > > > <enumeration value="QUEUED"/> > > > > <enumeration value="OPENACTIVE"/> > > > > <enumeration value="DEFERRED"/> > > > > <enumeration value="CLEARED"/> > > > > <enumeration value="CLOSED"/> > > > > <enumeration value="DISABLED"/> > > > > </restriction> > > > > </simpleType> > > > > > > > > If I want to add a troubleState to a troubleTicketValue, I can > only > > > add > > > > baseState. Parsing a document containing troubleState works > > > > fine, > > > > but > > > > I'd like to build documents with troubleState without parsing > > > > it. > > > > As troubleState is just a String I cannot use substitute(). Is > there > > > any > > > > other way to solve this? > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Ramin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may > contain > > > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated > > > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted > > > and/or > > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the > > > individual > > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended > > > recipient, > > > and have received this message in error, please immediately return > > > this > > > by email and then delete it. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the > individual > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended > recipient, > and have received this message in error, please immediately return > this > by email and then delete it. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
