It is not a bug, as Dennis said in a previous email, XMLBeans and binding tools
in general, try to do the right thing in many cases, but this is not one of
them. Even if this Boolean restriction seems simple enough, to support all
restrictions is impossible.
Check out the following example on how to use 0/1 instead of true/false for a
Boolean type:
XmlBoolean xb = XmlBoolean.Factory.newInstance();
xb.setStringValue("1");
XmlObject xo = XmlObject.Factory.parse("<a/>");
System.out.println(" xo: " + xo);
XmlObject axo = xo.selectChildren("", "a")[0];
axo.set(xb);
System.out.println(" xo: " + xo);
Cezar
________________________________
From: Wing Yew Poon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 1:27 PM
To: user@xmlbeans.apache.org
Subject: RE: Réf. : RE: Problem with boolean type
Then that is a bug. You can file a bug in JIRA.
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 2:16 AM
To: user@xmlbeans.apache.org
Subject: Réf. : RE: Problem with boolean type
Yes I get mustUnderstand="true" instead of mustUnderstand="1"
Valerie
"Wing Yew Poon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/10/2007 21:40
Veuillez répondre à user
Pour : <user@xmlbeans.apache.org>
cc :
Objet : RE: Problem with boolean type
Valerie,
what exactly is the incorrect behavior you are seeing?
Are you saying that the xml that is marshalled is incorrect after calling the
setter? i.e., you call setMustUnderstand(true) and the xml shows
mustUnderstand="true" instead of mustUnderstand="1"?
- Wing Yew
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 6:53 AM
To: user@xmlbeans.apache.org
Subject: Problem with boolean type
I have the following schema element :
<xs:attribute name="mustUnderstand">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:boolean">
<xs:pattern value="0|1"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:attribute>
Xbean generates the following accessors :
void setMustUnderstand(boolean mustUnderstand);
boolean getMustUnderstand();
This result in an xml attribute with value "true" or "false" : it is not
correct regarding the schema !
Is there anything to do to correct it?
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities,
that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged,
and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this
message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message
in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities,
that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged,
and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this
message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message
in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally
privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received
this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete
it.
