Scott, >From a standard organization perspective defining XML schemas it is a "best >practice" to consistently use the same prefix for a specific namespace across >the full schema domain of the standard organization. This practice increase >human readability of the XML schemas and sometimes xml documents conforming to >the schemas. However: This practice is really for information only intended for us dumb humans and not for code processing the xml documents. If a standard organization requires that a specific prefix SHALL be used to represent a specific namespace in xml documents based on the XML Schemas of the organization a solid foundation for non-interoperability is created. In principle the practice moves the semantic content of the namespace from the namespace to the prefix i.e. a misuse the namespace concept altogether. Namespaces can easily be created in a globally unique manner, prefixes can not. Basic XML Schemas from various organisations are very often used as components when building new higher level business oriented XML Schemas. If one requires that a specific prefix shall be used it is difficult to avoid clashes between prefixes. It is the namespace that shall resolve such clashes not the prefix. Scott, Can you please provide examples of standard organisations (and standards) that standardize use of prefixes beyond human readability ? Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards, for Det Norske Veritas AS Geir Øvsttun _______________________________
Principal Information Architect Division Sustainability & Innovation Web: www.dnv.com <http://www.dnv.com/> ________________________________ From: Scott Hinkelman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 9. juli 2010 13:12 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: XMLBeans does not correctly propagate namespaces Please be aware that while at the XML/namespace technology level prefixes are technically arbitrary, from a higher business perspective several standards organizations have standardized them associate with specific name space names for consistency and some increase in interoperability. Thanks, Scott --------------- Scott R. Hinkelman Software Standards Architect AIA Standards Architecture and Strategy Oracle Corporation Mobile: 512.415.8490 From: Duane Zamrok [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: XMLBeans does not correctly propagate namespaces None the less, if XMLBeans does not present a means by which to dictate the namespaces (which I'm almost positive it does through the Dom Nodes) then that is a shortcoming, if only small. From: Wing Yew Poon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 5:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: XMLBeans does not correctly propagate namespaces Justin, as Peter has clearly explained, prefixes are arbitrary; they are not what is important; namespaces are what matters. It appears that some people are hung up over the prefixes that get used to represent the namespaces ("the correct namespace prefix"). If your (or your customer's) code relies on some fixed prefixes, then, as Geir wrote, "I am afraid you may be in deep shit." That deep shit is not the fault of XMLBeans; it is the fault of bad code/software. - Wing Yew ________________________________ From: Justin Bailey [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 2:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: XMLBeans does not correctly propagate namespaces Follow-up... After some more searching, I found this thread which seems to describe exactly what the problem is: http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/[email protected]/1601039.html So it looks like this is a deficiency in XMLBeans, which is very disappointing. :( Anyway, I have resolved the issue by adding a regular expression parser which inspects the prefix that XMLBeans assigns to the namespace, then replaces it with the expected prefix. It's not what I would have preferred, but it does solve the problem. Thanks to the people who were kind enough to reply and provide assistance. I remain hopeful that this functionality will be added to XMLBeans in the future, since XMLBeans is in all other respects a very good library. Thanks, Justin **************************************************************************************The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message and its attachments. Any unauthorized use, copying or dissemination of this transmission is prohibited. Neither the confidentiality nor the integrity of this message can be vouched for following transmission on the Internet.**************************************************************************************
