Very glad to hear this! This would be a very very very useful feature! Let us know if we can help in any way to get this into apache ZK.
thanks mahadev On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Toader, Sebastian <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We are using ZooKeeper internally and ran into same issue where we wanted > Quotas to impose hard restrictions. We needed this primarily to protect > ZooKeeper server against rogue client applications that may cause Zk server > to use up the allocated memory thus affecting other clients as well. > > We've changed ZooKeeper's (version 3.3) code to impose hard restrictions. > Currently it's in testing. Once we are happy with how it we are planning to > push changes back so it will be available for others as well. > > One thing to note our implementation is not configurable whether to impose > quota or just warn if quota exceeded, it always enforces quotas if set on a > znode. > > Best regards, > Seb > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mahadev Konar [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 12:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ZK quota management > > The current quotas doesnt really impose hard restrictions on quota. It > would be nice to change the quotas to impose that. This shouldnt be a > big change but again given the Multitxn patch it might be a litte more > complicated. > > thanks > mahadev > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Fournier, Camille F. [Tech] > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was wondering if any of you used the Quotas feature in ZK in your >> production systems. If so, do you find it useful? How does it affect >> performance? >> >> Thanks, >> Camille >> >> > > > > -- > thanks > mahadev > @mahadevkonar > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTICE: Morgan Stanley is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions > or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, > advice within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform > and Consumer Protection Act. If you have received this communication in > error, please destroy all electronic and paper copies and notify the sender > immediately. Mistransmission is not intended to waive confidentiality or > privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the right, to the extent permitted under > applicable law, to monitor electronic communications. This message is subject > to terms available at the following link: > http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers. If you cannot access these links, > please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. By > messaging with Morgan Stanley you consent to the foregoing. > -- thanks mahadev @mahadevkonar
