All I have to say is "Life is too short for crap".
We are using ZK for large-scale mission-critical clustering for almost 9 months now, and guess what? Zero defects AFAIC. ZK contributors. I wholeheartedly appreciate your contributions. Life is too short for crap. Move on... Chang 2011. 6. 11., 오전 9:52, Patrick Hunt 작성: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> > wrote: >>> I had a long talk with Thomas at Buzzwords. >>> >>> He is far more congenial in person than on the mailing lists. >> >> Whether he's kind or not isn't really the concern at this point. The >> point is that there are real issues being raised publicly. ZooKeeper >> has a good track record on stability, but I have already heard the >> code isn't clean or pleasant from different people. It is also true >> that some features have been taking a very long time to land. These >> are pretty interesting points for a software project. Is that the >> case? Is there an intention to clean up the code base? Are features >> taking too long? What's scheduled for the current milestone and when >> is it going to be released? > > You can see our release history here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel > > 3.4.0 is definitely overdue, the move to TLP took significantly more > effort that we originally accounted for and that's slowed us down. > Mahadev is the release manager for 3.4.0 and is working to get it in > shape. (there's a thread on the dev list about this) > > Regards, > > Patrick
