FYI - we run ZooKeeper server and one instance of ZK client on Windows server 2003/ 2008. In general we have seen no issues running ZooKeeper on Windows (I haven't measured the client connection time).
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Sergei Babovich <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks for your response. This is what I suspected. Will see what I'll be > able to dig. The problem is I also use linux, and delay happens on machines > of others. The wireshark showed no difference in network messaging so I > suspect that something is delayed in windows communication stack. But will > see.. > > Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > "officially" windows is not supported, historically there just haven't > been enough windows users to support the platform: > > http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.3.3/zookeeperAdmin.html#sc_supportedPlatforms > > That said, Java should work essentially the same. Would be interesting > if you ran your client in the debugger and tried to figure out where > the time is going.... (or as Yang suggested look at the communication > itself...) > > Patrick > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Sergei Babovich > <[email protected]> wrote: > > zk-3.3.1. Java client. Java 64b 1.6.0_24. > > I will open jira report... > > But just curious if everything works fine for other windows 7 users and > we > > are special. > > > > On 07/22/2011 06:28 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > >> > >> Are you using the java or the c client binding? What version? I'd > >> encourage you to enter a jira (and submit a patch if you figure it > >> out). > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Patrick > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Sergei Babovich > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Hi everybody, > >>> > >>> I noticed quite strange thing: when connecting to the same ZK server > from > >>> a > >>> windows box it takes 4-5 seconds before receiving SyncConnected event, > >>> while > >>> from linux machine it is under 10ms. All on the same network. The > >>> behaviour > >>> is quite consistent across different windows boxes. As expected on a > >>> server > >>> side interactions look identical - there is no delay in sending > replies.. > >>> At > >>> this moment my only theory is some kind of delay by windows on > >>> sending/receiving message. Anybody observed anything similar? Any clues > >>> ideas will be very appreciated. > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Sergei > >>> This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain > >>> privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use > of > >>> the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended > >>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, > >>> distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or its > >>> attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message > in > >>> error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message, > all > >>> attachments and all copies and backups thereof. > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain > > privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of > > the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended > > recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, > > distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or its > > attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in > > error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message, all > > attachments and all copies and backups thereof. > > > > > This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain > privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of > the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, > distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or its > attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in > error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message, all > attachments and all copies and backups thereof. > >
