Ahh, I missed that in your message. This is a clever use of multi. ~Jared
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. > > But you can commit a single coordination file with version checks on 5 > pre-existing 1MB files. > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Jared Cantwell > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Currently, the limit on the sum of the sizes of the updates in the multi > > command is still 1MB. You cannot commit 5 1MB nodes in a multi-op. > > > > ~Jared > > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Another way to solve this is to use the multi command. > > > > > > The idea would be that you would upload multiple pieces of the large > > object > > > separately into different znodes (without using multi) > > > > > > Then you would update a pointer node that has references to the pieces > > > while > > > controlling for the version of the pieces (using a multi). > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Will Johnson > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > We have a situation where 99.9% of all data stored in zookeeper will > be > > > > well > > > > under the 1mb limit (probably under 1k as well) but there is a small > > > > possibility that at some point users may do something to cross that > > > > barrier. ... > > > > Is there some configuration parameter I am missing or code change i > can > > > > make? Or have people solved this another way? > > > > > > > > > >
