Sorry not John, Mike :)... mahadev
PS: not getting enough sleep! :) On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Mahadev Konar <[email protected]> wrote: > This is exactly what Hedwig does. > John as Neha mentioned, > You might want to look at Kafka/Hedwig/ActiveMQ. > > mahadev > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >> ZK definitely provides the raw material for something like SQS. >> >> Generally, however, a queue *in* ZK isn't quite as good an idea as a queue >> that is *coordinated* by ZK, mostly for performance reasons. Thus Pat's >> suggestion to look at Bookkeeper is not a bad one at all. A direct clone >> of SQS that pushes state to ZK for fail-over purposes would be very easy to >> build. >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Mike Schilli <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Seems like it should be possible to implement a queue service like >>> Amazon's SQS [1] with ZooKeeper, with queue items becoming 'invisible' >>> once a client picks them, but pop back into the queue after a timeout >>> unless the client doesn't explicitly delete them. >>> >>> Anyone done that? >>> >>> -- >>> -- Mike >>> >>> Mike Schilli >>> [email protected] >>> >>> [1] http://aws.amazon.com/sqs >>>
