Patrick, Please could you specify the JIRA tracking this linger change ?
Thanks, Neha On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > fyi That linger change was included in 3.3.4 and 3.4.1. > > Patrick > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Benjamin Reed <br...@apache.org> wrote: >> which version of the server are you using. this sounds like the linger >> bug that was fixed a while back. >> >> ben >> >> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org> wrote: >>> That is not what we would expect from the cluster. What do the server logs >>> show? >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:13 PM, 朱晨杰 <zcj0...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, everyone: >>>> I'm now using Zookeeper as my service server. There are 3 Zookeeper >>>> servers, then I use 3 pc connect to them. On each pc there are 20 processes >>>> connect to zookeeper cluster so there are totally 60 connection. I >>>> terminate 20 processes on one pc simultaneously, then I find the status of >>>> all the 60 connection turned to "disconnected". After a while, the living >>>> 40 process start re-connect to zookeeper, but they all become "expired". I >>>> thought the connetion of one client would not affect others, but the result >>>> shows it does affect. >>>> So I want to ask: Does it cost a lot for zookeeper to deal with a lost >>>> connnetion? And if too much connection lost at the same time will cause >>>> zookeeper deny of service? >>>> Thanks! >>>> -- >>>> Zhu Chenjie >>>> Zhejiang University, China
